| Username |
Post |
| Sadabichar |
Posted
on 31-May-03 03:14 PM
What the hell this Girija Babu talking about?
If he had guts, he should have returned from the Palace without attending the meeting. That would be truely his sacrifrice.. but he could not do so.
He attended the meeting with the King and other party leaders apart from his four main protesting parties. And after coming out of the Darbar, now he is shouting. This guy is an idiot.
Another thing is if he truely a Nepali citizen, being the leader, he should attend the meeting with any other citizen of the country, not only the RPP, NC(D) or Sadhavana Party, for the sake of the country!!!!!
See the fun. As soon as Chand pull out of the chair, these buggers all rushed to the Palace!!!! And right there in the palace, in front of the press (press represents the whole country), these leaders fought for the PM position. The entire 3-hout meeting they wasted talking on who shoudl be the next PM. Did they ever discuss about any good stuff for the country.
Yet again, these leaders proced themselves that they are behind only the power, not for the people.
|
| jaya_nepal |
Posted
on 31-May-03 05:46 PM
Well yeah they need not prove now. Since last decade everyone has seen their hunger for power. The consequence is clear. Once the party selected PM is nominated, the first few days would be a big fight - this time amongst all the parties for important ministries. Next step would be to appoint CDOs, SPs, and other officers to benefit the most. Then comes their foreign trips. In the meanwhile, Maoists might also walk out of the jungles, they would not be interested to talk to ANIMALS. Consitutional reforms would not let army to maintain law and order in the country. After months of "Ta Bhanda Ma Janne", one minister would resign showing difference in policy with the PM. Soon, the ex-minister's party would start yet another mass movement for a change in government.
This would be the normal scene after the change in government. Nothing to be surprised. This has been seen since last ten years. The result - either the royal coup may be similar to what Late King Mahendra did or the may be some external intervention. So, all Nepali people around be prepared for all this shit to happen.
|
| GP |
Posted
on 31-May-03 07:03 PM
Hi!
Biswo ji how do you find the reason and justification on Girija's threatening of boycotting the meeting, because Deoba was invited.
I will be looking forward to hear your opinion on Girija's current move? Please take it as positive request to you.
GP
|
| Bhunte |
Posted
on 31-May-03 07:30 PM
Sathi ho,
kuro sarai garo chha. desh ko sthiti najuk chha. dosh aru lai thuparera pani kam chhaina. samasya dekhi bhagera pani kam chhaina. aba ke garda ramro hola bhanne barema sochau na ta....
bhunte
|
| Sadabichar |
Posted
on 31-May-03 09:26 PM
In an informal chat with journalists here on Saturday, Koirala said, We have suggested Madhav Kumar Nepals name, following an agreement that the first cabinet would recommend revival of the House. However, our current agitation and demands are more for principle than the post.
This guy is nuts.
|
| GP |
Posted
on 31-May-03 09:37 PM
"In an informal chat with journalists here on Saturday, Koirala said, We have suggested Madhav Kumar Nepals name, following an agreement that the first cabinet would recommend revival of the House. "
This is prejudiced agreement. How can it justify following statement:
"However, our current agitation and demands are more for principle than the post. "
|
| bardan |
Posted
on 01-Jun-03 06:06 AM
its such a shame that these bloody idiots that whom we have to call leaders........are pursuing their own interests at this hour of crisis........ we should launch a movement to throw em out ...........we need a clean political culture in our country and thre biggest obstacle is GPK and MAKUNE!!!throw em out!!!!otherwise we are in for another phase of political mudslinging,cause sooner or later GPK will want to throw out MAKUNE like he did with krishna pd bhattarai...........MAY PASHUPATINATH SAVE NEPAL
barad
|
| Sadabichar |
Posted
on 01-Jun-03 07:25 AM
Not only that,
These buggers are talking about reviving the old parliament by the up-coming Govt. How can that be possible. That old parliament was dissolved constitutionally by Deuba, who went to the PM post by constitutional manner. The PM had absolute power to dissolve the house.
And now whoever gonna be the PM in Nepal at this moment, that PM choosing process is same as the way Chand was chosen to be PM. Hello? what's going on? If they thik that up-coming PM choosing is based on Article 128, then same was true when Chand was chosen!!! But these protesting parties already launched the movements (for principles?) stating that Chand Govt was formed constitutionally. So they cannot now say that the upcoming Govt. (whoever's it will be, MKN or Pashupati, Surya) is being formed by constiitutional manner. That Govt still be unconstitutional. Coz Chand resigned, and the King gonna appoint another PM in lieu of Chand.
Now the question is: I have heard that the PM can dossolve the house, but is there a provision in the constitution to revive the dead house by the PM. The upcoming PM of course gonna be still unconstitutional (by the logic of their own logic).
Funny thing is, if there is a constitutional PM, then there is no question of dead house. There is always a live house behind him. The house comes first then the PM. But such PM can dissolve the house, and continue to be constitutional PM in order to hold another election to create new house.
Sansar ma Kahi Nahune kura Nepalei ma Hunchha, Ke Garne?
|
| Sadabichar |
Posted
on 01-Jun-03 07:28 AM
"movements (for principles?) stating that Chand Govt was formed constitutionally"
should read 'unconstitutioanlly'.
|
| jaya_nepal |
Posted
on 01-Jun-03 08:46 PM
King Gyanendra appointed Lokendra Bahadur Chand PM after the political parties failed to name their leader after the royal takeover. The Supreme Court accepted the King's decision and hence it is constitutional.
The political parties say that is unconstitutional. Their demand is that King should revive the parliament and nominated their selected leader as the next PM, which is constitutional according to them. Reviving the parliament is not possible against the Supreme Court decision. And King nominates PM according to the choice of political parties, and that is constitutional..?? Is it just because it is their choice..???
They have launched a movement against the King. They want to change the government but no one utters a single word about peace talks or even the development process. They just want to assume power. That is their only ultimate goal. How can they act such bastards. Its shame that we people still choose these bastards as our leaders. Since, launching a mass movement is not a big deal in our country, we should now launch a movement against these leaders. That is the only way we can kick their lousy ass out of Nepal and make Nepal a peaceful destination in the world.
|
| KaleKrishna |
Posted
on 01-Jun-03 09:41 PM
Guys and Gals,
Don't you think that lack of alternative to existing bunch of jokers and greedy lot of individuals we prefer to call leaders is the main reason. Look at the scenario and prediction by "Jaya Nepal" in the thread seems as the most likely outcome. Where we stand, what we can do to root out the deep seated serpent of personal cause over national cause in every sphere of Nepalese life seems to be the only alternative. Political leaders are fighting for their survival and in this attempt they are targeting the monarch whose action so far leaves no room to complain atleast in context to recent happenings. Too much cornering of the monarchy may not be a right thing in overall nation's interest. Political leaders seems to have a second chance to show that past mistakes were as a result of infant democracy and their incompetence. Now, they must have realized that gone are the days when their bullshits gathered mass to clap for. They must have also realized that CIIAA and others may be monitoring their moves, that may either make them afraid to embezzle public funds or smart enough to do so in a better way. It is the time to see how media exposes the natabad kirpabad nominations of aure baures in different posts, sidelining genuine candidates. It is also a right moment to think if we need to join hand together to spread the message of mass participation to governance. is there any way we can educate the rural mass to participate their francise right in a genuine way, with out the influence of fear, greed and temptation.
May be there is someway we can prepare the masses for such revolution before next elections by contributing what ever we can afford.
|
| Sadabichar |
Posted
on 05-Jun-03 03:51 PM
Is it likely that Girija will yet again come up with conspiracy theory regarding Madhav Nepal's Mother's demise? She died in the teaching hospital while being under treatment.
let's see!!!
|
| allare |
Posted
on 05-Jun-03 04:00 PM
Sadabichar,
I do not think that GPK will go to that level, but who knows..
BTW, condolence to MAKUNE and may pashupati nath give him the power to recover from this situation.
|
| KaleKrishna |
Posted
on 05-Jun-03 06:10 PM
AS MERE MORTAL WE ARE ALL:-
I was wondering what will be the public sympathy or reaction in case GPK or MKN were to die now.
Will they be remembered for what they think, fight for more civilian power.
Will the memories be confined to the walls of party officies and wails from those who missed the chance to cash on their name.
I was just curious, because I have first hand experience of the momentary tide of emotions when Madan Bhandari died. The tear filled eyes or onlookers when we brought the body from bank of Narayani to Bharatpur. Now the memories are confined to some quarter, if that is the fate of once popular leader, what may be of these nautanki walas.
|
| Sadabichar |
Posted
on 05-Jun-03 06:28 PM
Oh..... if MKN or GPK were to die, perhaps that would be the happiest moment to each and every Nepali citizen.
However, aren't these buggers going through slow death???
|
| Bond-007 |
Posted
on 05-Jun-03 07:19 PM
---------oh..... if MKN or GPK were to die, perhaps that would be the happiest moment to each and every Nepali citizen-------------
Sadabichar Ji,
I have read you in quite a few threads and found that you are the biggest critic of MKN and GPK. Is there any other reason for you to dislike them beside they being Jana-aandalonkari shakti" and going against the Monarchy? I mean any personal differences with them when they were in power or just ideological and political difference? BTW, I am a Nepali Citizen and please don't include me in the group of people who will be happy in the death of National leaders.
|
| Sadabichar |
Posted
on 05-Jun-03 09:46 PM
OK you are excluded!!!
|
| GP |
Posted
on 09-Jun-03 11:39 PM
Why Makune can not become prim-minister?
One of the reason, he fails to wear COAT "jacket" according to rule. This photo from
Kantipur ........... I have seen him making always the same mistake in wearing the
COAT "jacket". He should learn first how to wear a coat .
GP
|
