Sajha.com Archives
clarifying note

   the marriage pictures were just a collec 20-Jul-03 Bhunte
     Site Admin ji says if we are to post any 21-Jul-03 phateko_kattu
       Bhunte, most of us could very well disti 21-Jul-03 Arnico
         >>most of us could very well distinguish 21-Jul-03 (*)Y(*)
           Arnico ji, I agree with you. Sometime I 21-Jul-03 Bhunte
             Khoi bro Bhunte, I just didn't like y 21-Jul-03 KaLaNkIsThAn
               Wait a minute? Those were not pictures o 21-Jul-03 arnico
                 Hyaa Kalanki le pani ke ke kura garchha. 21-Jul-03 Bhunte
                   >>malai thodai bahula kukkur le tokya ch 21-Jul-03 (*)Y(*)
                     Check the web-site below. Those who didn 21-Jul-03 Bhunte
                       Kalanki ji, yo ta pakkai hajur ko permi 21-Jul-03 Bhunte
                         Bhunte sarkaar!! Tyo hijo nai tyo web 21-Jul-03 KaLaNkIsThAn
                           <br> I totally agree with the idea of a 21-Jul-03 tourmaline
                             tourmaline, i also agree with you 1,00,0 21-Jul-03 Bhunte
                               glad to see this discussion heading in a 22-Jul-03 Arnico
                                 lthough the idea of getting consent from 22-Jul-03 San


Username Post
Bhunte Posted on 20-Jul-03 10:06 PM

the marriage pictures were just a collection of photos about socity and culture .......thx
phateko_kattu Posted on 21-Jul-03 04:02 AM

Site Admin ji says if we are to post any picture in sajha.com ,it must come with a note .But how do you check the authenticity of that note ?does that note requires signature and Anguthako chaap from the person related ?

......just curious !!!
Arnico Posted on 21-Jul-03 01:16 PM

Bhunte, most of us could very well distinguish between your sharing your own personal photos, versus what biratnagare did.

While we are on the topic of people photos on sajha, though (site admin, are you listening?)... I would also like to question the practice of including within postings sajha.com photos from Nepali gatherings for the purpose of commenting on the looks of participants. In fact, I get a sense that most of the rude comments are not even from people who attended those events, but from people who live in other cities, don't know the individuals in the photos, and enjoy using the anonymity of hiding behind nicknames to make disrespectful remarks.

Yes, I DO think it is nice to use sajha.com resources to share memories of fun events (in fact, I've even participated in photographing events for sajha.com). BUT, that is not for the purpose of providing far-away folks with cheap thrills, and it is NOT supposed to induce additional self-consciousness about dress, make-up, hairstyle and split-second gestures on the dancefloor among people getting together to have fun...

In fact, San, at future events, I would reduce the amount of "action" photography on dancefloors and focus more on posting photos of semi-posed groups of people who consent or request to have their photo taken for online posting...


(*)Y(*) Posted on 21-Jul-03 01:21 PM

>>most of us could very well distinguish between your sharing your ,own personal photos?

^_~
Bhunte Posted on 21-Jul-03 05:10 PM

Arnico ji,
I agree with you. Sometime I feel discussions without illustrations may be monotonous. Let pictures speak thousands words....
KaLaNkIsThAn Posted on 21-Jul-03 06:41 PM

Khoi bro Bhunte,

I just didn't like your idea of posting someones marriage picture hai. dil pe matt le yaar!! I just didn't get a chance to write it yesterday in your posting, but first few pics were okay, but when it came to close up pics of bride and groom, I just assumed either it's your own picture or you have permission to post those pictures. Those marriage pictures are private pictures, unlike the pictures you take on the street of NYC, hoina ra?

Khoi ke ke, That's just what I thought, aba Bhunte bro le paleti kasera lecture dine hola malai....!! BHOOOOO PUGYOOO, I HAVE ENOUGH LECTURE FOR A DAY! Give it to me some other time! hehe.
arnico Posted on 21-Jul-03 07:32 PM

Wait a minute? Those were not pictures of Bhunte's own marriage???

I guess I must have only seen the thread when the pictures were freshly posted, before the facts came out...

So... Bhunte, NO, that was NOT good. I second Kalankisthan's points.
Bhunte Posted on 21-Jul-03 07:46 PM

Hyaa Kalanki le pani ke ke kura garchha....malai thodai bahula kukkur le tokya chha ra kam napayera tyo pic bina authority yeha tasna lai!
(*)Y(*) Posted on 21-Jul-03 07:52 PM

>>malai thodai bahula kukkur le tokya chha ra kam napayera tyo pic bina authority yeha tasna lai

2 dozen pic ek pachhi arko gari ko post gareko dekhda ta tyastai laageko thiyo!!
Bhunte Posted on 21-Jul-03 07:54 PM

Check the web-site below. Those who didn't get the opportunity to see the marriage picutures, here they are. This way any confusion about those pic would be anulled....Enjoy viewing them and put your feelings here....

- http://the-voyagers.tripod.com/wedding.htm
Bhunte Posted on 21-Jul-03 08:08 PM

Kalanki ji,
yo ta pakkai hajur ko permission bata bhako po ho ki jasto chha...in jest

KaLaNkIsThAn Posted on 21-Jul-03 08:25 PM

Bhunte sarkaar!!

Tyo hijo nai tyo website ko link muntira chaapya bhaye ta miss-under-standing nai hunna thiyo ni!! eh...!!!!

eh... (BTW, did you acquire a permission from http://the-voyagers.tripod.com/wedding.htm before you cut and paste those pics on Sajha?)

okay, kina aaankha tarya ni tyastari? Dinn bhari taruni le aankha tarera bawaal bhaa belama!! okay...!!
tourmaline Posted on 21-Jul-03 09:20 PM


I totally agree with the idea of asking for one's consent before taking/posting pictures of people attending community events. It is intolerable to have one's picture posted without consent and to top it all, to have anonymous people commenting on looks as has been the case time and again after grand releases of event pictures.
Bhunte Posted on 21-Jul-03 09:26 PM

tourmaline, i also agree with you 1,00,00,00,000%.....you know that these people need to be educated with some law literacy ... ... very bad......
Arnico Posted on 22-Jul-03 11:06 AM

glad to see this discussion heading in a constructive direction!
San Posted on 22-Jul-03 12:19 PM

lthough the idea of getting consent from people before posting in threads is a great idea, it is not feasible when it comes to posting pictures of people in a community event.

If pictures are supposed to be a memory of the event, then there will have to be pictures which are 'action shots'. It would not be feasible to inturrupt performers during an event and ask for consent before taking pictures :) In the same way, when taking a picture of the audience it would not be feasible to ask everyone's consent.

When posting pictures from an event, if the pictures are to be a reminder or a representative of the event itself, then there will have to be 'action shots' or else the spirit of the event will not be captured in the pictures.

Having said that, I have always been responsive to any individual request regarding not wanting their pictures in the site.

Discouraging posting personal pictures in the threads definitely is a step in the positive direction for sajha.

Best Regards,
San