| Username |
Post |
| ashu |
Posted
on 04-Jul-01 12:47 AM
Hi Namita,
This is again the real ashu posting from Nepal.
I read your poem (and Bhuwan P's and others'
comments) directed against me. Very funny, but
how very sad.
Since I know only you personally (out of all commentators
to that thread), I want you to know that I, the real
Ashutosh Tiwari, did NOT post that "brand name" stuff
here or anywhere else.
Someone else did -- in an obvious effort
to make me look like a dog and make decent people
like yourself rise up against me. And in that
they seem to have succeeded quite well.
This is the simple truth.
Namita, I don't blame you and others for falling
into my enemies' deviously clever and ultimately
misleading trap.
Luckily, I am still standing/sitting fine.
oohi
ashu
|
| ashu |
Posted
on 04-Jul-01 02:12 AM
Namita,
I've also been thinking:
If one provably 'nakkali' posting with my name can make
you -- a sensible person -- go poetically ballistic against me (someone you have worked with and have known for a number of years even when you are free to disagree with me), just
IMAGINE, just imgaine, the sheer nagative emotionalism that
my Somerville-based enemies --claiming, of course, once-upon-a-time ko friendship with me -- have been arousing in the heart-and-mind of total GBNC strangers (folks who have never met me, let alone worked with me) for the past three years by spreading
lies about me!!
See what I am dealing with?
Fortunately, since I defend the truth and NOT the lies,
their lies against me do not bother me.
And at times, I feel like getting angry at them, I remember
their fathers' various personal and professional (and, by now well researched) actions, and forgive them, for these sons
not know where there genes lead them . . .
That said, I do consider that OTHER GUY -- the emotionally
explosive pudkay-pudkay kalay-kalay one -- just a cheeky
little bugger and just a "rish ko poori".
oohi
ashu
|
| The Lone Gun Slinger |
Posted
on 04-Jul-01 11:06 AM
Namita, this dude 'Ashu' is trying really hard to get you on his side, isn't he? But I know you won't fall in his trap, 'cause you are one smart lady.
|
| kta |
Posted
on 04-Jul-01 11:48 AM
I feel very bad for Ashu dai. I know the pain you feel when someone else posts in your name. Those guys are nothing but scoundrels. Just remember truth will come out. BE cool Ashu dai. I had a very nice impression when i first met you.
|
| namita |
Posted
on 04-Jul-01 05:18 PM
Sorry, it's old news (i was absence for 14 hours 10 minutes) by now, but I would like to say: I believe you Ashu if you say it was not you who posted the "brand name." So please relax that posting (it was kinda song, not really poem poem - if you know what I mean :))is for that poster. Allow me to make one more thing clear - I am not against you. If I were you I would let it slide. Not jump up and down and start digging somebody's father's histroy.
You are what you are no matter what others think. Also, take this site as a grain of salt, as I do. It is not a matter of life and death!
Namita
Lone Gun Slinger: Thanks for your faith in me but I was also wondering at the time: it was rather late to post stuff from nepal. Does ashu ever sleep? Sorry mate.
|
| ashu |
Posted
on 05-Jul-01 12:20 AM
Namita,
Too late.
I've already -- quietly and methodically and tenaciously done
the research, interviewing a number of people such as Dr. Devkota and former RNAC staffers, among others -- and basically done the background research on my so-called enemies' families here in Nepal, and the stuff I have discovered is very, very fascinating.
Sure, genetics has its limits, but it's now easy for me
to at least see how these people -- no matter how friendly they
appear on the surface -- got their devious sides . . . I expect to keep the findings of these reasearch PRIVATE :-)
On another note, it's amazing how easily people talk in Nepal,
and the only thing to make sure is that each 'subject' is really telling the truth and the way to ensure that would be to rigorously/fairly cross-check their, well, 'testimonies' for similarities. All this, you will agreed, is excellent
preparation for a career in law :-)
Look, I consider myself a reasonable person: and I well know the emotional cost of waging any war. And I NEVER would have gone to the extent of researching individual family history had I not
been unfairly slammed by these guys in Boston and beyond.
But this is the war I did NOT start here, and, in fact, I did request, at least three times on previous occasions, the other side to come to the table to settle the whatever
matters.
Rajesh did, in the presence of Sachit and Sanjeev
Khadka, and I have now nothing against Rajesh though his
hacking abilities have long been well known amidst
select circles.
But it's the other guy who thought that he could teach me
a lesson, by crying his eyes out, by emotionally influencing
people, by turning some of my former friends against me (I don't, by the way, rue their loss!), and he thought he could
outsmart me by unfair means . . . well, a big mistake!!
After all, if I had made mistakes, then, I would have had no problem to say, "Look, I goofed up; Please forgive me." But
I've been made a victim of this guy's gross emotional immaturity,
and well, I'm not going to take that lying down ALL THE
TIME.
I too have my limits.
And so, it was only after patiently using Saam, Daam and Ved
that I now feel justified to now use Danda in full force. I
know this sounds ridiculous on some level; but this guy has
given me no choice but to be his enemy number one, and
I am now going to be such a good enemy that he:
a) either approaches me for a 'closure' of the issue so that
he can quietly continue his life ko journey.
b) or spends his life in hiding while I make the world
laugh at him and ultimately pity him.
Look, I don't enjoy doing any of this, and, I guess to my credit, I have NEVER involved my brothers in this war.
But this guy has involved his unsuspecting brother and his vinajuu and everyone else in this war . . .I mean, had been telling the truth, he alone could have defended himself; that he's been lying is one reason why needs an army to wage his war against me while I can counter any of his moves singly.
oohi
ashu
|
| loner |
Posted
on 05-Jul-01 12:46 AM
Namita, let this be on record --- ashu ADMITTING that he's doing "research" on people's FAMILIES! Interestingly, there was once a character named Kanak Baniya on SCN that had posted a lot of "private" details on the immediate family members of ashu's enemies. How some people just love talking about devious ways!
|
| ashu |
Posted
on 05-Jul-01 01:29 AM
So?
What does that prove?
Whoever the hell was Kanak Baniya, I assume he was
a fictitious character like gaathe and ramjhamay kainla
and a host of others who attacked me then.
As my SCN posting would show STILL on record,
I had sharply DISAGREED with Kanak Baniya
then.
If you have the time, please post whatever
that Kanak had posted and repost my reply
to Kanak Baniya too.
But some people's repeated digging up KB's name
here now makes me suspect maybe, despite my
then objections, the guy had been telling the
truth then.
Else, why would anaonymous posters here continue to
dig up references to what I have always considered to
be just plain lies?
Hmmm . . . very interesting.
oohi
ashu
|
| biswas baral |
Posted
on 05-Jul-01 04:57 AM
Thanks namita for supporting my views.
bye,BISWAS
|
| biswas baral |
Posted
on 05-Jul-01 04:57 AM
Thanks namita for supporting my views.
bye,BISWAS
|
| biswas baral |
Posted
on 05-Jul-01 04:57 AM
Thanks namita for supporting my views.
bye,BISWAS
|
| Reetu |
Posted
on 05-Jul-01 08:11 AM
hi baral ji,
why don't you keep doing repetition of the same postings thousands of times? keep going, haaa...haaa...
Reetu...
|
| PDK |
Posted
on 05-Jul-01 09:45 AM
Ashu dai,
I don't know you personally. But I have been reading your postings. I understand that your friends might have let you down or something and I also understand how furious you are and all you can do is make them feel worse by writing. To me, you seem like a guy who wants to be famous. Nothing wrong with that. But beating around the bush and going nowhere, writing in bits and pieces about your "enemies" here in the forum is not going to help you or us. The names of the people you mention are not writing any thing bad about you here. (as far as I know). Bringing up the things that happened years ago, and getting everyone's attention to your personal history and your hatred is no good. I have respect for you but if you keep on writing about your enemies and not any other informative pieces, you are going to lose the respect i have for you.
|
| loner |
Posted
on 05-Jul-01 09:54 AM
It proves that you have no qualms about lying and you know that. Kanak Baniya was a product of your imagination (as you now even acknowlegdge it was a not a real name!). The style of your writing belies you, whether you write as Kanak Baniya, Sameer Tiwari or Bhupendra Rawat.
Of course you would go on to publicly disagree with Kanak Baniya, so you can come out clean and look like a hero in the eyes of unsuspecting bystanders. Very smart!
As you here admit doing research on people's families, no wonder why people do not want to use their real name when dealing with you. No one would want you to go after their brothers, sisters, father and mother to settle your personal score.
You are a wolf in sheep's clothing. The TRUTH will, some day, reveal who you really are.
|
| Gyan |
Posted
on 05-Jul-01 11:43 AM
Talking about fictitous characters .....
Who was the one that went got a hotmail account under false name?? Don't even go there Pal!!!!!
Pretty pathetic to be wasting your time researching other people's families(stalker). I probably would get a restraining order against you.
People who know, know how dirty you are. why did you get banned from E-group ???
Complaining about people talking in Nepal...... Are you not doing the same thing here ??? BITCHING......
Who is laughing at who it is pretty obvious...
|
