| Username |
Post |
| Ahura Mazda |
Posted
on 28-Aug-03 11:15 AM
1 What is the significance of King in Nepal anymore? If he is seen as a symbol of national unity, is it not perfunctory because, after the royal massacre, neither people see him as the moral authority nor the political leader?
2. Why is His Majesty scared of constitutional assembly if he thinks he has the support of majority of the people or he is the political leader of the country?
3. Why is the talk process derailed? To strengthen the people or the His Majesty?
4. Why are the major political parties support constitutional monarchy even after such hostility? Is it not time for political parties to go hand in hand with Maoist for republican state?
5. Is it not that the current political situation king versus people rather than Maoist versus the people?
6. When political partied get all the blame, why have we been so forgetfull of 234 years of monarchy?
7. Why constructive monarchy? Our country, we rule!
Lets see What Sajhali has to say!!!
|
| sparsha |
Posted
on 28-Aug-03 11:43 AM
1 What is the significance of King in Nepal anymore? If he is seen as a symbol of national unity, is it not perfunctory because, after the royal massacre, neither people see him as the moral authority nor the political leader?
I am not quite sure. I just don't want to say "nyauri mari pachhuto". So, I am still not decided.
2. Why is His Majesty scared of constitutional assembly if he thinks he has the support of majority of the people or he is the political leader of the country?
Who said "he thinks he has the support of majority"? He is not quite sure whose support he has. That's why he is scared. As long as RNA is faithful to the King, we are going to see Lion Flag in Narayanhiti.
3. Why is the talk process derailed? To strengthen the people or the His Majesty?
Neither. The participants failed to maintain attention of the other party. Hence, the process derailed. Who wants to sit in a boring meeting?
4. Why are the major political parties support constitutional monarchy even after such hostility? Is it not time for political parties to go hand in hand with Maoist for republican state?
Whom do they support then, if they don't support the constitutional monarchy? Baburam or Prachanda or Badal or---? They (so called democratic parties) are in dharmasankat. This "democratic" thing is killing them.
5. Is it not that the current political situation king versus people rather than Maoist versus the people?
I don't think so. The current political situation is not really a political issue but socio-economic. "Tauko for, kursi jod" is political situation in Nepal. So, it is XXX Vs YYY. Common citizens have become "balika boka".
6. When political partied get all the blame, why have we been so forgetfull of 234 years of monarchy?
Fresh wound hurts more.
7. Why constructive monarchy? Our country, we rule!
Really? Who is "we"? and where do we rule Nepal exactly from? sommerville?
|
| Zero_creativity |
Posted
on 28-Aug-03 11:53 AM
1. There is no significance of king. For betterment Nepal SHOULD BE decleared replubic state. Why we need king when there is no use and just few some selfish groups want it.
2. This is a right time for government to accept Maoist demand for consitutional assembly. Let's see what people want. That would be a democrative way.
3. Talk derailed but all it did was strengthen Moaist.
4.Political parties are selfish.They are scared if Maoist comes in power and declear communist state then they have to go nowhere.
5.Country is in a caios. Hard to say who Vs who. It seems everyone Vs everyone.
6. People forget old things and remember new things. Political parties were out of power last year and they ruled Nepal for 12 years. They are the main contributer for this uncertainity. They are more responsible.
..............
|
| KaLaNkIsThAn |
Posted
on 28-Aug-03 11:59 AM
King or no king, what change it is going to bring, when all the politicians are as good as Gunaraj Brother ko thulo bau!!
(Okay, if you don't know how was Gunaraj bro ko thulo bau, then you have to go check his thread right?)
|
