Sajha.com Archives
Prime Minister Baburam

   Maoists have elected Baburam as Prime Mi 09-Jul-01 NYC
     a short comment:- if baburam has been a 09-Jul-01 Reetu
       a short comment:- if baburam has been a 09-Jul-01 Reetu
         If Baburam is Prime Minister, then Prach 09-Jul-01 Big Whiskey Kid
           On Ashad 23, Kantipur wrote an article, 10-Jul-01 HallaiHahllakoDesh


Username Post
NYC Posted on 09-Jul-01 08:25 AM

Maoists have elected Baburam as Prime Minister of "central government" - selection of other ministers to follow in two months. Interesting article in July 9 Samacharpatra.

No mention of Parchanda anywhere. I am beginning to believe Parchanda does not exist and is simply an imaginary persona created by Baburam.
Reetu Posted on 09-Jul-01 09:43 AM

a short comment:- if baburam has been announced as a prime minister as if he was, is as crazy as aloon.

Reetu...
Reetu Posted on 09-Jul-01 09:47 AM

a short comment:- if baburam has been announced as a prime minister as if he was, is as crazy as a loon.

(note: it is doubled on posting)

Reetu...
Big Whiskey Kid Posted on 09-Jul-01 12:00 PM

If Baburam is Prime Minister, then Prachanda must surely be the President (the Head of State). But both of these guys are loonies to believe that they can grab power so easily. Ten years hence they will still be declaring each other prime minister and minister and chairmen and so on in the jungles of some remote western hills.
HallaiHahllakoDesh Posted on 10-Jul-01 02:40 AM

On Ashad 23, Kantipur wrote an article, Kina Dipendra le mare?
with a big bold letter head. The article is full of story, but,
SOURCE: "On researcher says:" who is that researcher or investigator? Name does not exist. The writer wrote a story
on his own imagination, why Nepali Journalism is behind rumors.
Now they, think they can write anything like a fake story based
TV drama. They don't have to be accountable. Nepal is really
a HallaiHahllakoDesh. There is no legal responsibility too,
because our intellectual mass want PRESS FREEDOM, they write
whatever sensational fake stories they like, and they can
just tell that "an unnamed, unVerifiable investigator" told
the news over telephone. If any one really wants, he can
write Paras is new, Gyanendra dies, like Hritik Roshan case
and excite peoples. Well, no one has to take responsibility
for any thing that happens because of such news. Kantipur did
it second time.

Similarly, the news of BRB being PM of 2nd Nepal is also
cited as a unNamed source. Who is going to verify it?
Who needs it (verification)? is probably the best qustion.
We HallaiHahllakoDesh bashi, will listen to any news and believe,
we were never educated that any cited news or views should have
source, verification, if not counter verification. Everyone
wants to be in news, from PM to Peon, everyone likes to make
news, well, we don't dignity, thats why we don't care about
the 100gm JIBRo, and believe on it. Verification, was never
taught to us, because we believe in God, the super power,
that has no scientific numerical verfication.

I will call nepalis who believe in news that are without
single name of the cross verifiable person, as As.s.Hole,
brainDead Nepali. The writer and publishers deserve same
titles "As.s.Holes" . This news can not verified, take
it as granted.