| Username |
Post |
| jhilkay |
Posted
on 14-Nov-03 01:00 PM
Hey, did you hear the news? So how many of you believe that the Maoists are committed to the multi-party system????
|
| Chordaku420 |
Posted
on 14-Nov-03 01:23 PM
I beleive it. I think Parties and Maoist need to be united to overthrow Rana/Saha dynesty.
DOWN with Gyane and DOWN with PANCHE.
|
| suva chintak |
Posted
on 14-Nov-03 02:27 PM
People,
we might want to reign in our enthusiasm over the crumb that fell off the Maoist table the other day. I see too many people salivating already!
First they said they were 'committed' to the people. The poor people salivated...until they began to extort, kill, rape, conscript and exploit the people into ruin.
Then the Maoist said we are 'committed' to development. People began to cheer and jump saying our Maoist brothers are great liberators. Then they began to bomb the airports, blast the bridges, and destroy the dams and telephone lines.
Now, the Great Leader has said that the Maoists are after all for 'multi-party.' I say watch out multi-party!
On a different note: We don't like people when they begin castist or communal slander against Bahuns or any of the many Janajatis. Isn't it the same castist prejudice to attack shah/rana? People might have objections to certain individuals, but to slam the whole caste group? Sounds like ignorant bigotry to me...but I could be wrong so I stand to be corrected.
SC
|
| peda |
Posted
on 15-Nov-03 01:01 AM
It is like a Cat saying, "I will never eat a mouse again!"
|
| ru |
Posted
on 15-Nov-03 03:18 AM
maoist as inherently supporting multiparty democracy....yeh right! eauta baburam ko party, arko prachanda ko party, ani kahilekahi ashwashan ra atyachar ko cocktail party.
way to go guys.
|
| sage2003 |
Posted
on 15-Nov-03 09:48 AM
This is another one of their ploys to win legitimacy from people and international communities to white-wash their darkened faces. It is no different than the government saying we will hold election without specifying the date and security condition. Last time these so called Maoist came out for peace talk with the government, they were able to win some legitimacy as a political force which helped soften their dark public image. Now they are seeking to do the same, which is to deceive, one more time. They are playing for the international communities, which so often pays attentions to only the headlines. These one liners with no substance, believe it or not, makes headlines. After all how many times we have heard this rhetoric? Too numerous to count. These so called Maoist are just criminals led by some educated thugs who know how to twist the facts and hide their ugly faces behind ideologies that have no solid foundation. To call them a political force, is to insult Nepali people, who have seen even the main stream political parties go to hell in a very short time period. Let us not just read the headlines and assume the snake has shed the poison, instead demand actions to support their claims. They have every right to be part of our democratic process but before that let us make them re-educate themselves what “people†means and what “peoples' power†means.
|
| isolated freak |
Posted
on 15-Nov-03 11:13 AM
Before you go on with this discussion, you have to understand what Maoism means:
Mao Zedong worked under Chen DuXiu at Beijing University. Chen DuXiu was a Marxist and one of the Profs. behind the establishmnet of the Chinese Communist Party within the GuoMinDang (nationalist) party. Young mao was thoroughlly impresed by the idea of Marxism and wanted to apply in China. However, there was this HUGE technical problem: Marx's theory and the whole of the Capital was written thinking about the industrial workers of Europe. marx never thought very highly of the peasants. Sicne, China was more of an agrarian society in the 20's and 30s, and Chairman Mao, who was promoted to a decision making body of the CCP because of his exceptionally brilliant skills in converviting people, had this dillema: how to make Marxism work in China. The only solution that he could think of was to replace "workers" with "peasants" from the Marxist doctrine. There were many people who helped him with this, most notabley, Zhou En Lai. Mao also came up with this ideas of "revolution from below" and "continuing revolution". Noone gave much importance to Maoism since most academics were still confused with Maoism and Marxism. It was only in the 60s, during the Cultural Revolution, Lin Biao came up with this idea of theorizing Chairman Mao's thoughts. hence we had Maoism- A plagarized version of Marxism.
Chairman Mao was a brilliant person, an able statesman, no questions regarding that. During his "active" period he came up with some of the est writings on warfare and socialism, among which "to Defend oneself.." and "Startification of Chinese Peasants" are quite famous. All of Mao's fame started to go downhill when Peng Dahuai was purged from the party in the later 50's and because of the Cultural Revolution in the 60s to the mid 70s. Some people were critical of Chairman Mao because he could not passify the "extremes", including his wife Jiang Qing who were later prosecuted for the violence during the Cultural Revolution, or wen hua da ge ming or the ten years of Chaos, as it is known in China today.
|
| isolated freak |
Posted
on 15-Nov-03 11:15 AM
wanted to apply in China= apply it in China
party in the later 50's and because = late 50s
|
| isolated freak |
Posted
on 15-Nov-03 11:22 AM
On Maoism and Democracy:
No, there's no such word as "multi-party democracy" in the Maoist dictionary.Its a different thing if the Maoists changed the whole idea/theory and adapted Multi Party democracy in their book, but in real Maoism, the idea that resulted in the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949, it doesn't exist at all. Chairman Mao was all for establishing the "dictatorship of the Proleteriat". Also, there's a clear fault in Maoism: The State has to be powerful but at the same time people ought to be powerful. This, if applied, it will results in clahses between the State and the people.
That's why the Chinese Communist Party in the 80s acknowledged that Chairman Mao committed some errors and it was him ALONG WITH THE OTHERS, who established Zhong Hua Ren Min Gong He Guo (People's Republic of China).
|
| isolated freak |
Posted
on 15-Nov-03 11:25 AM
This, if applied, it will results in clahses between the State and the people. = This, if applied, will results in clahses between the State and the people.
|
| khimu |
Posted
on 15-Nov-03 02:35 PM
reading nepalnews make me sick
including MKN, GPK six inch dick
Babu ram and Gyanendra playing chase
rest of the party making all over mess
|
