| GP |
Posted
on 25-Jul-01 01:14 AM
In return, Prachanda asked his militia all over Nepal to "stop all pre-planned offensives for the time being" and to remain in defensive posture. Nepalnews.com
How many peoples will believe or feel comfortable with
this call for CEASEFIRE? Do you really think its an honest
call for CEASEFIRE from both sides? I don't think so.
Well, Tamils in 1989 called for first CEASE FIRE, i.e.
6years after the break of war. Nepali Maoists called
CEASEFIRE after 6th year of war break. Very similar.
In Sri Lanka the story of CEASEFIRE is now like Tide in
Ocean. What about in Nepal? I think its a tide in Nepal
too. Once this tide settles on the beach, we can find
anothe coming. The coming days will be more devasting,
because both side will accuse each other not have
enough environment for the negotations. Once next tide
comes, we will hear much more deaths, the way it happens
in Sri Lanka. Well, in 1989, Sri Lankan friend of mine,
had party for the first call of CEASEFIRE, assuming its
the end of war, wow, before they finished food on their
plate, they had to rush for BBC to hear new tolls of death.
So, don't have parties. Expect bigger TSUNAMIS of death
news.
I believe its 99.99999999% drama from both sides.
GP
|
| EastSideBoy |
Posted
on 25-Jul-01 01:35 AM
This stupid ceasefire will be broken by the Maoists in less than two weeks. If Deuba believes that he can persuade the Maoists to give up their arms by mere table talks, then he is a fool.
There is only one solution to this problem, and that is to use the army. If they are not prepared to do this, then they should give up, pack their bags and go somewhere else. Other people who can do will take over. For example, the King and army.
|
