| Sajha.com Archives | |
| Username | Post |
| ranjit_rana109 | Posted
on 06-Jun-04 05:37 PM
Australian Aboriginal tribe called the Yakutjarra from the central desert have an adage that goes like this "sow an act and reap a habit, sow a habit and reap a charaater, sow a character and reap destiny." This is the analogy of the living law of a living nation. In contrast, by deductive inference a reasonable mind could conclude that Nepalese nation is a decaying nation. Why? The Monarch has only three or four geriatric Nepalese leaders in his repertoire of whimsical and musical chair for Prime Ministership. Why cannot he not trust the next generation of educated Nepalese modern day leaders? I just find this Gyanendra's peculiar paranoia totally crippling the economy of Nepal. I have no words to recommend how to come out of this monarchial madness that goes to no where the other side of the black stump!!!!!! Nepal has no vision, no mission, no goals, no strategies, no objectives, no tactics, no operations for modern democracy. It is just directionless, rudderless and reaching a point of no return. I have come to conclude that in this universe nothing is good and nothing is bad. What matter most is about our personal bias. Then again we can never come of it of our bias. What we can do is be aware of our inherent bias. All I can do is pray for the nation of Nepal that wisdom prevails and that all this rubbish fighting should immediately stop. All energy should be devoted to the building of our nation called Nepali Aama. Thank you very much |
| Dr. Strangelove | Posted
on 07-Jun-04 04:43 AM
I hear you loud and clear! It's not only the economy that's suffering due to the current political imbroglio but the whole nation state. On a different note, what's this lawsuit all about, Doc? http://www.findlaw.com.au/cases/default.asp?task=read&id=200196 |
| Dr. Strangelove | Posted
on 07-Jun-04 03:17 PM
http://www.findlaw.com.au/cases/default.asp?task=read&id=200196 ApplicantJudgeJudgment_datedDistributionMNCNumMNCPlaceRespondentStateFEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Rana v University of South Australia [2004] FCA 559 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE ý appeal from decision of Federal Magistrate summarily dismissing application claiming unlawful discrimination ý principles relating to summary dismissal ý where application said to lack merit ý application need only disclose a reasonable cause of action ý court should not consider whether the application will ultimately succeed ý approach where litigant unrepresented. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE ý philosophy underlying proceedings in Federal Magistrates Court ý absence of pleadings ý function of pleadings generally. Federal Magistrates Court Rules Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth) Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Magistrates Act 1999 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Hunt v Allied Bakeries Ltd (1956) 3 All ER 513 applied Hall v Nominal Defendant (1966) 117 CLR 423 cited Tampion v Anderson (1974) 48 ALJR 11 applied In the matter of an appeal by Gaye Alexandra Mary Luck [2003] HCA 70 applied Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 104 FCR 564 applied Dýcor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 applied Niemann v Electronic Industries Ltd [1978] VR 431 applied Mulley v Manifold (1959) 103 CLR 341 cited Gould and Birbeck and Bacon v Mount Oxide Mines Ltd (In Liquidation) (1916) 22 CLR 490 cited Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioner (1949) 78 CLR 62 cited General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 applied RANJIT RANA v UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA S 826 OF 2003 LANDER J 7 MAY 2004 ADELAIDE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 826 OF 2003 ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA BETWEEN: RANJIT RANA APPELLANT AND: UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA RESPONDENT JUDGE: LANDER J DATE OF ORDER: 7 MAY 2004 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The time within which the appellant might apply for leave to appeal is extended to 3 February 2004. 2. Leave to appeal from the order of the Federal Magistrate made on 21 November 2003 is granted. 3. The appeal is allowed. 4. The matter be remitted to the Federal Magistrates Court for further hearing. |
| ranjit_rana109 | Posted
on 08-Jun-04 04:28 PM
Just a test case to pave my way AND SUE Deepak Bista. Go to http://www.austlii.edu.au Type SAN v COMCARE you will understand that Deepak Bista has been a star witness against me by providing his service to Australian Military Intelligence. See Ya Later me moy mateeeeeeeeeeee. |
| rauniyar | Posted
on 08-Jun-04 10:02 PM
Good Day Mate! well, I see two different court cases depicted at considerable length on the links posted.. My understanding of legal words are rather limited; I find myself lost in translation. Ranjit Rana ji, could you do me a favor and write your version of what these two different cases are about? Thanks much! Uhi Rajeev, CT, Amrika ps when did you exactly make it to Downunder? |
| Dr. Strangelove | Posted
on 09-Jun-04 04:30 AM
G'day Doc, It seems that you like picking "fight" with everyone ...U of SA, your nephew Vivek and this Bista mate, who I see apparently runs a Nepali restaurant in Adelaide. I was reading somewhere that you've even been "banned" from his establishment. Are you a rebel without a cause or a caustic rebel?:) |
| ranjit_rana109 | Posted
on 09-Jun-04 06:53 PM
Picking fight...rebel without cause...odd ball...essentric....blah blah blah I think being innovative means neo-conservatives don't like innovation no!!!!! INNOVATION = UNDERSTAND + OBSERVE + VISUALISE + EVALUATE + REFINE + IMPLEMENT. No one has ever banned from me from no where. I champion the cause of sad, bad and mad people. It is the notorious people who do creative interpretations of other entreupreneurs. They are the gate keepers who racialise, stigmatise, sexualise and marginalise people. As I have said in this universe nothing is good and nothing is bad. It only that people are biases and no one can do anything about it. We simply have to be aware of it. I champion the case of Human Rights of mad people as I must be one. Does that make sense to you and I also love Nepal to be a Republic. I say to Vivek good luck and to Deepak don't be a con artist as one can go to http://www.austlii.edu.au Type Gopi Bahadur Roka and one can see the name of the greatest Nepalese fraudster and Deepak was part of it. This is my last posting. |
| ranjit_rana109 | Posted
on 10-Jun-04 01:47 AM
Justice should be justice according to law and justice should not be justice through an individual's law said Lord Dunidin. I consider myself as a Law Peer of the Nepalese realm. Thw two cases depict my test case masqurading as a lunatic and do a MBA at UNISA. The Professor of Management indicated I cannot do MBA as lunatics like me frighten other business students. I also then sought exemption from group activities. I was denied all reasonable accomodation value proposition enshrined in Australian Human Rights laws. Round one a racist Magistrate Raphael summarily dismissed my case and on appeal I won and paved way for self represented litigants ease and no bullying by nasty high income earning Lawyers. This is what the celebration is all about as it is a landmark precedent. |