| Username |
Post |
| Reetu |
Posted
on 23-Aug-01 10:19 PM
Hi San,
I could not erase my name and email address, while I used a "Mac" to post a writing. My friend tried to change it, but no way. I have least knowledge of using Mac.
Could you please help me to fix the problem? My name and email add were sticked on the boxes "Your Name" and "Your Email:".
If there is not possible to solve the problen, I have to use other name: Let me announce it.
Hi all,
I have mentioned the problem above, so I have to use pseudonym. I will be using a name "Apsara".
Reetu.....
|
| Indra |
Posted
on 24-Aug-01 09:29 AM
kun chai APSARA?
Urbasi ki Urmila? Urbasi used to be really damn hot.
|
| bik |
Posted
on 24-Aug-01 11:07 AM
Reetu,
I had the same problem last week and I was using a NT operating system. However, that does not seem to be a problem anymore. So,either the problem's been taken care of, or it was just one of those freakish things for wich you just need to reboot the computer.
|
| San |
Posted
on 24-Aug-01 11:23 AM
To Reetu & Bik,
If you have registered your Username, and you have used the particular computer to log in, it saves your username and email address so that you do not have to enter them again. You define whether you want the computer to store your password though.
As soon as you post a message using a password, you are in a LOGGED IN state. If you are logged in, then you cannot change the USERNAME and EMAIL ADDRESS. When you are logged in, you see a link called
|
| Reetu |
Posted
on 24-Aug-01 02:18 PM
bik, San, and all,
Thanks for info and possible solution, but I changed my password. I feel that I am secure now and want to continue to post using the name "Reetu."
Reetu....
|
| Reetu |
Posted
on 24-Aug-01 03:38 PM
Hi San,Hi San,
There is another problem that when I try to read the postings of the title "Infamy", it always accesses the posted web site cristianitytoday dot com. I can not read any postings. Could you please stop opening it, unless someone wish to access it?
It seems so powerful web site !!!!!
*******..................*********...................*******
To Biswo,
Hi Biswo,
Let me tell you something. You mentioned somewhere that Malls did come to Christians in Kantipur. It is thoroughly, completely, impartially wrong.
Let me see, in 1743 Prithvi ascends to throne of Gorkha. From 1768 to 1775, Gorkha conquers Kantipur valley. He died in 1775.
The web cristianitytoday dot com says " Ever since King Prithvi Narayan Shah expelled Catholic Capuchin priests in 1760, the policy of the Nepali government had been to prevent Christians from entering the country and to mistreat those who managed to do so. For centuries, Nepal was unusually isolated."
It has one thing that "Prithvi expelled Catholic Capuchin priests in 1760."
Pirthvi conquers Kantipur valley from 1768 - 1775. But, he expels Catholic Capuchin priests in 1760. It is eight years before than he conquers the valley.
If Malls give Christians to say in Kantipur, Prithvi can not expel Christians, before he wins valley. He expelled them before he took control the valley. So, Christians were apart of Kantipur and Malls. You could not say that Malls did come Christians in Nepal.
Another point, I did not say that Christians came after Treaty of Sagauli, I did say that after the treaty British got to stay in Nepal. I did not mean British represents the Christians. Now, You are able to understand what my saying is and how you have presented miss information on the web.
Cheers.....................
|
| San |
Posted
on 24-Aug-01 04:08 PM
Hi Reetu,
Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I had set up the page so than any link posted gets converted to a small window in the message page. But it so happens that some websites employ 'framebreakers' which basically breaks out of any frames - which is what happened with that christian related page. Anyways, I have removed that automatic frame inclusion to be mere links which you have the choice to click if you want to view.
Regards,
San
|
| sparsha |
Posted
on 24-Aug-01 04:35 PM
Eventhough, the posting addresses Biswo but this is not his personal email. So, I assume I can drop some words here regarding the reply posted by Reetu.
>Let me tell you something. You mentioned
>somewhere that Malls did come to Christians
>in Kantipur. It is thoroughly, completely,
>impartially wrong.
I have no clue what Reetu is saying. I think in the past Reetu mentioned that she attended TU, Kirtipur. I wonder if she were working there or doing her Masters. If the above English represents a Master level student of TU then TU probably means Tato'n Chharo University.
>If Malls give Christians to say in Kantipur,
>Prithvi can not expel Christians, before he
>wins valley. He expelled them before he took
>control the valley. So, Christians were
>apart of Kantipur and Malls. You could not
>say that Malls did come Christians in Nepal.
Here you go , again. I am remembering a small story of lahures' wives. Once two lahures (let's call them A and B) returned to their village. Next day, at padhero their wives met. A's wife started to praise her husband's unique attributes (as if she must prove that her man is the best). B's wife got intimidated. So, as soon as A's wife dropped one more praise for her husband saying "My husband writes in such a way that no one except him can read what he writes." B's wife intercepted, "That's nothing, my husband's writing is such that no one not even himself can read".
>other point, I did not say that Christians
>came after Treaty of Sagauli, I did say that
>after the treaty British got to stay in
>Nepal. I did not mean British represents the
>Christians. Now, You are able to understand
>what my saying is and how you have presented
>miss information on the web.
Another example of vague reasoning.
>Cheers.....................
Cheers............what for?
Reetu, do us a favor by writing in concise and coherent English. I love to read you but I also want to understand you.
I have not mastered the English language. I am only a learner. I myself make many mistakes. I am not here to prove whether you write better or worse than me. I want to understand what you write, that's all.
Now, take it easy.
sparsha
|
| Biswo |
Posted
on 24-Aug-01 06:33 PM
Reetuji:
What should I say about your self-contradictory writings?
In Infamy you wrote:
>There was not any cristians untile the Treaty of Sagauli. This treaty allowed to
>British to reside in Nepal. For reference, you can read Edward M. Spiers's
>book "British and Gurkhas.'
In this thread you wrote:
>I did not say that Christians came after Treaty of Sagauli, I did say that after
>the treaty British got to stay in Nepal
What do you say now, Reetuji? Were there any christians then in KTM or not?You
very well remind me the poem by Ishwor Ballav : "Aago ka phool haru hun, aago
ka phul haru hoinan.."
Another point about the dotcom content: I am not here to defend the dotcom.
Prithvi in deed conquered KTM in 1825 BS(1768), and the website should write
1760s rather than 1760.
The point I wanted to prove was there were Christians in KTM since Malla era, as I
and others also had read in our history books, esp in Nepal Parichaya books.I
wanted to prove the point by searching in some webresources, and the likely
resource for that could be an article on history of missionaries of Nepal. That is
how I ran into the website. I neither endorse nor support their other content.
Again, the main point of this discussion is to prove that attack against Itihas
Shiromani is totally misguided and unwarranted one. I hope to learn from you why
you think otherwise.And how can we justify this attack against as innocuous man
as late Babu Ram Acharya thirty years after his death?
None of us will achieve anything by nurturing prejudice against those very persons
who more than anybody else worked hard to illuminate us about our own land and
history. May be some of us think Nepalese people can't write their own
history, and dependance upon the foreign source would be discreet choice. May
be some of us love to think that formation of Nepal as a state was wrong and
immoral phenomenon. My ancestors came from Kaski, the state who rebelled
repeatedly and fought at least two wars against Shahas of KTM during the
unification process.But I have no grudge about that, and no misgivings about the
correctedness of the unification.Smaller states in Nepal were signs of instability of
Nepali people then, not a pride.Similarly, Prithvi Narayan Singh, as a king of
Gorkha, surely did a fantastic job of holding all Nepalese together, and defending
us from the taxing life and disgrace of colonialism of that era by making a bulwark
of united Nepal against the British force.
I am always open to your contrary points. But please, don't write groundless
and illegimate points. In this very subject, you have written a lot of unproven
and invalid points, as you can see by going back ,and they served no good to all
of us.Verity is the best trick to prove an argument.
Have a good day.
|
