| Username |
Post |
| NK |
Posted
on 18-Oct-01 01:45 PM
What is the point of Ashu bringing NK'S name again and again and her being "so touchy?" What kind of satisfaction do you get when you take the Name NK over and over again? Is this some Mantra you want to jap for your better life for the next time around? Just show one proof where Nk is being touchy you so eloquently pointed out. On the contray (now read carefully what follows next) NK (namita) was very restrain when somebody called her a "bitch." Your contradictory thought process which shows in your writing is just that a confused state of mind. And inability to say "hey I goofed." When somebody disagrees with me I don't mind and I even welcome. But somebody, here it is you, who wants take a high road pretending he is talking about idea but talks about personal matter weaved into it then NK strikes back. And when you cannot control yourself from barging in when Nk (I) ask sthe webmaster (where you had no business of opening your dirty mouth) to do something on her behalf. You don't like to swear at people then it would be just apparent how low you are as a human being (not a debator, mind you), but you call names, swear with a high minded verbosity. People who are able to see it, see it.
I think it is you, ashustosh tiwari, being ashutosh tiwari who sees enemy lurking in every cyber sentence, in every comments which shows ashutoosh's tiwari's short fall in thinking process, and sees NKs' or friends or deputy or NK herself in various disguises, when it would have been suffice to say - again hey "i goofed, i sometimes write which i don't really mean, or i am a little petty fellow who wants to be Icarus." (read greek mythology, you will get to know your mind very well) Also do you happen to know the story of Narcisuss? read it you will know better yourself then.
this posting is in reference to so called "clarifying thoughts" which was response to Milan karki and my comment "it never ceases to amaze me how peoople like to discredit again and again" which sadly ashustosh tiwari took it personally. do you know the saying chor ko khutta kat, ashutosh? ask around if you don't know what it means. Also again read Icarus, and Narcisuss.
Also ask your jesuit fathers who taught you English to tell you the meaning of "on the Contrary." While you are at it ask your philosophy professor what it means to admit failure.
It just amazes me how people like to make fool of themselves again and again and again. It is just amazing....
FINALLY ONE REQUEST: Don't take NK'S name when it is not absolutely necessary. Do you know what Hindus say? Everytimes you take somebody's name then you will wash out their sins. You don't want to be my saviour, do you Ashutosh Tiwari, or should I say Ram Babu KC?
|
| NK |
Posted
on 18-Oct-01 02:05 PM
And because of you Ashu I resorted to NK. When a so called friend takes the inside information and flashes out to the world to aruge his weak point then I have to be very careful. I am really waiting for you to find out the inside scoop of my family. when are you going to flash out that to the world? Oh by the way what else have you found out about your "enemy" in sommerville? I and some friends of mine are waiting breathless.
I know people don't want to hear all these things, but at some point one has to draw a line. I am just so tired of him taking my name to argue anything and everything. is this some kind of obsession? hmmmm.....
Finally ashu you can go on making wild remarks about individuals, all power to you. For the time being I will remain quiet. I will give you that much satisfaction
|
| DhobiKhola |
Posted
on 18-Oct-01 02:21 PM
You know NK,
I don't have anything personal with him but I can never forget him, cause he is in my top 10 irritating person list.
He used to be a big time nauseating, annoying person and he is still like that huh ! wow! After all these years, he has not learned to change his irritating behavior.
SANAI dekhi lageko bani mari gaye pani chhadai na.
|
| nobody |
Posted
on 18-Oct-01 04:26 PM
Why such a big fuss over the use of "on the contrary"?
X believes A. On the contrary, Y believes B.
What does one infer from it?
That i) A contadicts with B or ii) Y opposes X. In the first case, isn't it OK for two people to have contradicting views? It doesn't say that A is right or B is wrong! It just says "I hold a view that contradicts with yours". It doesn't question X's right to that view nor does it ask X to change X's view. The second case kinda indicates X and Y should have agreed upon something, but now we find them going different ways.
Well that's my two cents, but of course, you're free to disagree... My opinion:) And why should it affect Cs that B opposes A even if that was the case?
Also I don't think the comment "it never ceases to amaze me how peoople like to discredit again and again" was ever taken personally, because the reply directly addressed to the same people you were talking about, and that's where he disagreed with your "opinion". What made you think that he was defending himself? Rather I found him defending the NGO(?). He may be Narcissus, Icarus, but not this time. Proteus?
If truth can be bent to one's purpose, illusions definitily can lead us anywhere...
|
| nobody |
Posted
on 18-Oct-01 04:34 PM
Rather there is an ambiguity about who "it never ceases to amaze me how peoople like to discredit again and again" is directed to!
Your defense!
|
