| Username |
Post |
| ashu |
Posted
on 27-Nov-01 10:43 PM
All right, Biswo.
You do NOT have to apologize to Kunda Dixit.
Mine was a just a friendly suggestion.
And it's perfectly fine if my suggestion is NOT taken
by you or by anyone else here. You are entitled to post
your arguments and counter-arguments in this open forum,
and that's life.
Doesn't bother me.
That said, I applaud GP's taking time to apologize to Kunda
Dixit.
Well done, GP!!
Let us continue to make this site a site for:
a) relentless honesty.
b) continuous learning, and
c) mutual respect
Sure, those are ALL difficult goals, but let us try to achieve them
with the best of our collective abilities.
oohi
ashu
ktm,nepal
|
| ashu |
Posted
on 28-Nov-01 04:53 AM
GP wrote:
Before I write further in this topics, I must inform here everyone
who was hurt by my postings that I had sent my sincere apology
to Mr. Kunda Dixit for my inability to wait until his clarification comes,
and in fact, under the situations and sceneraios many peoples
believed what appeared in TOI and I was also chased by the news
and caught before seeing clafications.
Its in fact, a lesson to me
and I can not reverse the part I hurt to Mr. Dixit, but, surely, my
conscious says its time to regret -and- apologize for my part,
and lets hope not to make same mistake second time. Its also
time for all Nepalis to be careful while talking to foreigh
journalists especially, Indians, because you are not sure how
much they will sort out and purge the things to make excerpts
exactly fit their need. -GP
*************************
Thanks, again, GP.
Making such an apology in the most straightforward like you have done above
goes a long way to restore the issue of fairness in a debate some of us try to maintain in this forum.
We all know that equating those holding different ideas from us with being 'traitors' or "RAW ko agents" and hurling other colorful adjectives is
one practice we can do without here.
oohi
ashu
ktm,nepal
|
| Biswo |
Posted
on 28-Nov-01 10:34 AM
>We all know that equating those holding different ideas from us with
>being 'traitors' or "RAW ko agents" and hurling other colorful adjectives is
>one practice we can do without here.
What are you trying to say , Ashu?
First point: GP opposes what you are trying to say.
Second point: Do you mean I said anybody agent or traitor? Show me where? If
you want me to say him traitor or agent, fine. But your statement only shows that
you have learned tricks from the yellow-journalist of TOI. Why don't you follow
your own norm and show me the paragraph?
I am using generic noun for traitors. There are traitors, and we don't know who
they are.They don't come with billboard in their head. Did BP knew that in 2017,
his closest comrades like Tulsi Giri, Parasu Chaudhari, Rishikesh Shah would betray
him and his foe Bharat Shamsher would side with him?
|
