| Username |
Post |
| Suman Dhakal |
Posted
on 13-Feb-02 04:09 PM
naparnu raicha ghato pari hale fukaouna gharo vo
naparnu raicha ghato pari hale fukaouna gharo vo
napasnu raicha ankha vitra hajur, niskana gharo vo
|
| Nepe |
Posted
on 13-Feb-02 06:17 PM
Surgery of your Muktak:
>Naparnu raicha ghato pari hale fukaouna gharo vo
Use 'thiyo' or 'parthyo' instead of 'raicha' if you mean 'it was not supposed to happen'. ‘Naparnu raichha' would mean ' I finally found out that it was not supposed to happen'. That does not go with what you report.
>napasnu raicha ankha vitra hajur, niskana gharo vo
Well it sounds grammatically correct. But what you are reporting as happened can not have happened. You got in somebody's eyes (ok mind) and could not get out ? How did you know you actually entered ? Did she (who else) tell you that or you just guessed ? Actually you are boasting about the things that never happened. 'Niskana garo bho'... give me a break !
If you are saying the other way round, that is, that SHE entered into YOUR eyes, but you can not let/make her go away and you are reporting your problem to the audience, then that could be a believable story. But you should be writing,
'Naraakhnu raichha kasailaai ankhaa bhitra Hajur... nikaalna gaaro bho'
This is a worse scenario. I mean, then you would be saying you are not happy with what happened, you are regretting that you let this to happen. In this case, it would become a trivial thing unworthy of a muktak.
Basically your muktak is a trivial and dishonest report.
Nepe
|
| aaron |
Posted
on 13-Feb-02 10:07 PM
AAKHA AAKHA JUDHI RAHE MUKHLE BOLNA SAKENA
BOKH PYASA , NEEDA HARAYO, AAFNO MUTU AAFNAI BHAYANA,
TIMILE KINA BHANINAU?, MAILE KINA BHANINA?, PAHILE KINA BHANINAU?
MUTNE MUTNE GASAU BHANERA.
Enjoy
|
| radio nepal karmachari |
Posted
on 13-Feb-02 10:23 PM
aaron
that boka version was patented among radio nepal ko karmachari, were u there?
|
