Sajha.com Archives
Strife

   Hi, This posting pretty much concerns 05-Mar-02 Strife
     Strife: For your information I have alr 05-Mar-02 naresh_karki
       To do everything, here at http://www.GB 05-Mar-02 HahooGuru
         Dear Naresh you raise some issues that a 05-Mar-02 san
           Naresh, by the way, I have removed the p 05-Mar-02 san
             This is a good model: GBNC,a Nepali 05-Mar-02 ashu
               I stopped visiting SCN after many WEBKOO 06-Mar-02 AngTamB
                 Go Naresh GO, You the man....My man... 07-Mar-02 Naresh Fan
                   Okay, must have missed this one. So thi 07-Mar-02 anepalikt
                     This is a free forum isn't it? So why is 07-Mar-02 frank - linga
                       Another trait prevalent among certain ne 07-Mar-02 walter
                         I for one have no problem with Naresh's 08-Mar-02 _BP
                           No one is talking about community standa 09-Mar-02 COMMUNITY STANDARDS
                             I think the Community did speak already! 09-Mar-02 anepalikt
                               Hi anepalikt, I am pretty much agree 09-Mar-02 Strife


Username Post
Strife Posted on 05-Mar-02 03:30 PM

Hi,

This posting pretty much concerns with the reaction of Naresh Karki (whoever, you are.) and his shameful act on this web site as well as his thoughtless other postings.

I am very much sure that the GBNC and all the Nepalese people of Boston regards to the effort of this web master. What did he do wrong? Did he do wrong removing your brother and sisters pictures in this web site? You were welcomed to portrait your self as that pictures. Why do not do that?

Mr. Karki, you are not the first person and won’t be a last one either, who has raised this issue, however regarding San’s effort to contribute for GBNC is splendid. It is legitimate to contribute personally to GBNC, no matter what degree of effort that is. Why are you against with the web master, San?

I personally admire his effort of keeping this web site for Nepalese people all over the world and I personally regard to the all the visitors, but not like you. Now, you see what difference people layout about your dirty effort and others genuine work.
naresh_karki Posted on 05-Mar-02 10:41 PM

Strife:
For your information I have already apologized for that posting. But here my concern is not about removal of my posting. But I do have some questions. I am just asking who is running this site? I am just curious does GBNC give solo right to San to run this site and to do whatever comes in his mind and make rules accordingly. There is no question that this is the best Nepali web site I have ever seen. From each and every aspect, no other Nepali web site is even close to it. I do personally admire the work of Webmasters and thank them for their efforts.

Strife, my posting might be thoughtless. Of course my posting is worthless if you compare with Ashu, sunakhari, pachaim, NK, Biswo, Nepe and others. You shouldn’t expect every body is talented like them and everybody has same level of thinking and everybody could write like them. It is not necessary every body likes academic discussion or healthy debate though. It could be possible many people did like my posting as I got overwhelming response. I realized that I did mistake. Again I ask excuse for my misdeed. I shouldn’t do that.

I just want somebody to address my concerns. My curiosity is still there. Am I not allowed to ask question, which solve my curiosity? I am just asking how this website is organized. If this is official website of GBNC or private property of SAN. If you think that asking reasonable question is shameful act, then I proudly say I did it.

Finally Strife, you are trying to be personal. I did not expect you to write like this

“Did he do wrong removing your brother and sisters pictures in this web site? You were welcomed to portrait your self as that pictures. Why do not do that?”.

Ans: If you think I would be offensive and write dirty words out of my anger, then you are wrong. If dog bites me, I will not bite it.


San worte: “Hope I've answered your question. Please do continue this thread on community standards. It would be nice to know what everyone's expectations are.”

I am again curious what are those COMMUNITY STANDARDS. Could somebody explain me? San if ask you my expectations, I want you guys to allow everybody to put their view and don’t remove any posting. It would have been better if you had removed only link (that connects my website) rather than remove whole thread.

Naresh Karki
Baltimore.
HahooGuru Posted on 05-Mar-02 11:13 PM

To do everything, here at http://www.GBNC.org/
or http://www.sajha.com/ , San does not need to get
permission from the GBNC, and its because when GBNC
authorized him to be their webmaster, he got some minimum
mandate that he don't want to be a webmaster of Pornography
site, as similarly as Naresh Karki. So, GBNC is probably not
interested in pure open like Junge or bath-room or bed room
club. It has its own standard, and it surely should have a datum
line where its visitors of all ages and all categories don't need
to be cross verified, i.e. kids of parents, should not be putting
SAJHA.com in blocked URL list, rather San is doing pretty good
job by putting restricted site under separate column. He has
done nothing harm. There should be bottom line, San has to
maintain it at least for all those visitors who visit this
site and tell the stories they read here to others, including kids
and recommend them to visit this site whenever they have.

San, keep it up. Like Police in Hollywood movies allow guys
to carry guns, but, they won't leave you if you lift your gun
from pocket and pose it. Similarly, San has not bannd anyone
here, not even Nepali Porn-Star Naresh, but, once Naresh puts
his Pornography here, San clicks on his Gun and triggers the
posting so that it goes inside the SEX group.

Naresh, my 2 yen suggestion to you, Don't become headache
to other "descent" readers, and especially, if you turn the
Sid-Harth of this site.

hGxP
san Posted on 05-Mar-02 11:21 PM

Dear Naresh you raise some issues that are answered in the About Sajha section. To quote


"Sajha.com offers customized community settings whereby visitors can create their own community site. Admin users can be created who will be able to add items to NEWS and EVENTS sections. This service is meant to bring together Nepalese living in any part of the world - so that someone can participate in local activities, yet be a part of the global community......"


Basically, GBNC uses the service provided by sajha.com (at zero cost to GBNC)
Sajha.com does not operate on the whim of the webmaster. It has evolved thru time taking suggestions from visitors like yourself. Also your thread was not deleted, it was just moved to a different usergroup.

Hope this answers your question. Also Naresh if you have any personal questions regarding this you can contact me directly at san1@ix.netcom.com I will be happy to answer any questions you might have.

Best Regards,
San
san Posted on 05-Mar-02 11:27 PM

Naresh, by the way, I have removed the porno links you posted again in the top 10 list. I would appreciate if you post these kinds of link in the sex usergroup only! Thanks.
ashu Posted on 05-Mar-02 11:45 PM

This is a good model:

GBNC,a Nepali community, is ONLY and ONLY a client of sajha.com
GBNC has no say whatsoever re: what goes on here, but is free and welcome
to post relevant messages.

Sajha.com is owned and maintained by San.

Because of its growing popularity, this site now serves as a FREE platform for Nepali communities worldwide. Hence, the point about customization to suit
your geographic location! I already see that Nepali communities in Washington,
Minnesota, Alabama, Japan elsewhere use this site to promote their community events, and that's a good thing.

But sajha.com has its own expenses and costs too.
There is no such thing as free lunch.

Now, San, if we can only come up with viable ways so that sajha.com makes money to keep itself going, that would be great. The recent introduction of the paypal stuff is a good beginning to that end.

Maybe one topic for our kurakani at that

SAJHA DOT COM BRUNCH

at Mike's Breakfast in Naxal this coming Sunday could be: "how to
make sajha.com financially viable so that its "free" services are paid
for.

oohi
ashu
ktm,nepal
AngTamB Posted on 06-Mar-02 05:53 AM

I stopped visiting SCN after many WEBKOOFs started posting irrelevant postings.Thanks to GBNC and Sajha. So far, the postings here have been pretty good, barring a few. Let's not allow those Webkoofs to invade it. Will keep visiting it.

ATb
Naresh Fan Posted on 07-Mar-02 08:40 PM

Go Naresh GO, You the man....My man....we are with you .
anepalikt Posted on 07-Mar-02 08:50 PM

Okay, must have missed this one. So this IS San's site! Well, I guess that answers my query too (see the other thread). Appreciate the service San and I hope you will still seek to involve the communtiy though and NOT let a few posters to push you towards Censorship. I agree with Ashu, this last removal (of the link, rather than the thread), is much more palatable and better model!
frank - linga Posted on 07-Mar-02 09:40 PM

This is a free forum isn't it? So why is Naresh apologising?
Certain e-Hahooooligan's( aka Hahooguru) narrowmindedness shouldn't infringe on Mr. Naresh's right to post on this forum...
walter Posted on 07-Mar-02 09:47 PM

Another trait prevalent among certain nepali individuals is this:every time they see someone naked, the reaction is something like...."imagine you mother/sister in their place...." 'Strife's response to Naresh's lovely ladies.

Hypocritical bs. Do these people imagine doing their siblings every time they have sex?
_BP Posted on 08-Mar-02 06:37 AM

I for one have no problem with Naresh's posting. He prefaced it adequately, and was even self-deprecating in writing that it may not appeal to the many "academically minded" people who visit this site. I would have been upset if the pictures uploaded automatically. There are enough annoying posts out there to overlook this non-issue. There is a sex category on this site, so a link with an appropriate advisory is not a problem, to be consistent.
COMMUNITY STANDARDS Posted on 09-Mar-02 11:23 AM

No one is talking about community standards raised by Mr. Naresh Karki. This site is getting too much personal. Prompt reply from authorized person is expected.
anepalikt Posted on 09-Mar-02 12:43 PM

I think the Community did speak already! People said they don't want to see the kind of sites Karki put up is acceptable in the main kurakani section! San was responsive to the standards set by this sommunity: no explicit xxx stuff in the main section, there is a seperate usergroup for that!

Of course, if you ask me, i'd say our community standards should be higher and we should NOt allow such stuff anywhere at all! :)
Strife Posted on 09-Mar-02 01:09 PM

Hi anepalikt,

I am pretty much agree with you. All the explicit material should not be linked with this web site. It has established its standard of FREE discussion on whatever topics, except XXX.

Needless to suggest anyone who are fascinated with the explicit materials can visite commercial web sites. Remember, you have nothing to pay posting your legitimate views in this web site.

I hope that Mr. San has his own standing for building up a healthy Nepalese Community in Boston through this web site.