| Username |
Post |
| Brook |
Posted
on 19-Mar-02 02:30 PM
Dear San,
I think this question, due to the way it's worded, holds an inherent bias and veils some of the fairly nuanced arguments given by Ashu et al in other threads thereby invalidating the intended purpose it was expected to serve in this ongoing debate.
Brook.
|
| naresh_karki |
Posted
on 19-Mar-02 11:49 PM
Definitely this question itself is biased. And MOST important thing out here is credibility of this poll. Even a dumb person can anticipate the result when “Solo Malik ( Sauji will be appropriate word)” of privately owned website have a poll for self defense.
The probability of manipulation of votes is still high. My suggestion is You do not even need to keep this poll just for formality .You are entitled to do whatever you want as this is your private property
|
| Muna |
Posted
on 20-Mar-02 01:42 AM
Naresh_karki,
You seem to have problems with this site. Why do you even bother coming here and posting if you have doubts about how this site is run. Any self respecting person will stop going to a site they don't trust. Or do you have ulterior motives??? Does the popularity of this site bother you, so that you are trying to bring it down. Are you jealous that this site is getting all the hits?
If you are a self respecting individual, just leave this site alone if you have problems with how it is run. Otherwise learn to appreciate what you are getting for free.
|
| id |
Posted
on 20-Mar-02 01:50 AM
Hey Naresh,
If you don't like this site's way of running, why don't you create a site of your own. We will see how unbaised it will be compared to this site. If it is better definately you will attract all the visitors of this site, and till then, stop bitching about this site.
|
| ashu |
Posted
on 20-Mar-02 01:52 AM
As a supporter of San and a visitor of sajha.com, it greatly distresses me to see him going to the length of creating this heavy-with-loaded-words poll
when
the truth is: the site ALREADY comes with a disclaimer.
If "sole discretion" is to be exercised, that's perfectly fine and well stated.
If so, why not use such discretion and refer people to read the following?
Also, the disclaimer says that "WE EXPECT THAT YOU WILL USE CAUTION AND COMMON SENSE AND EXERCISE PROPER JUDGMENT WHEN POSTING TO OR VIEWING KURAKANI."
oohi
ashu
ktm,nepal
***********************
DISCLAIMER
SAJHA.COM does not control the information delivered in the KURAKANI forum, and it has no obligation to monitor the postings. However, SAJHA.COM reserves the right at all times to disclose any information as necessary to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, legal process or governmental request, or to edit, refuse to post or to remove any information or materials, in whole or in part, for any reason whatsoever, in SAJHA.COM's sole discretion.
BY THEIR VERY NATURE, DISCUSSION FORUMS MAY CARRY OFFENSIVE, HARMFUL, INACCURATE OR OTHERWISE INAPPROPRIATE MATERIAL, OR IN SOME CASES, POSTINGS THAT HAVE BEEN MISLABELED OR ARE OTHERWISE DECEPTIVE. WE EXPECT THAT YOU WILL USE CAUTION AND COMMON SENSE AND EXERCISE PROPER JUDGMENT WHEN POSTING TO OR VIEWING KURAKANI.
Your use of the Web Site is at your own risk. If you are dissatisfied with any of the Materials or other contents of the Web Site or with these Terms and Conditions, or other policies, your sole remedy is to discontinue use of the Web Site.
IN NO EVENT SHALL SAJHA.COM BE LIABLE TO ANY USER OR ANY THIRD PARTY FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY OR LOST PROFITS) RESULTING FROM THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE WEB SITE OR THE MATERIAL, WHETHER BASED ON WARRANTY, CONTRACT, TORT, OR ANY OTHER LEGAL THEORY, AND WHETHER OR NOT SAJHA.COM IS ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
|
| naresh_karki |
Posted
on 20-Mar-02 12:02 PM
All votes against him was deleted. My predications were correct. Now site admin would say those are suspecious. How come those votes are suspecious when one IP address is allowed to vote for one time only.
I rest my case here.
Naresh Karki
Baltimore
|
| ???? |
Posted
on 20-Mar-02 06:19 PM
Everybody is crushing at Mr. Naresh Karki. But no one here is not able to answer his question. I do not understand why everybody is after him. Does he commit any sin?
This is virtual world. Why all people san, naresh, ashu etc are crying here. Somebody spent 3 hours to change result of poll..Just make me laugh. Stop fighting guys take it easy.
America ma basne nepali ko kehi kaam chaina jasto cha.
|
| RK |
Posted
on 21-Mar-02 08:27 AM
Hi everyone,
my sincere apology to san dai, sorry for the stress i caused u for by messing up with the polls. I do not have any offense with anyone visiting this site nor do I post stuffs here. so Naresh Ji I dont think san is being baised or whatever, its all because of me.
I appreciate san dai's effort in trying to globally unifying the nepalese community.
sorry was just being one of those naughty kids
Rk
|
| 13-thum |
Posted
on 21-Mar-02 12:41 PM
Negative voting in this poll is also substantial. One third of voting should be considered substantial in any poll and even more when the question is leading towards the opposite direction.
13-thum
|
