| ashu |
Posted
on 19-Mar-02 11:58 PM
JDV wrote:
>Quite the double-talker isn’t he? I’m sure most of us will remember that not too >long ago, Ashu demanded some poster to furnish proof that he was/wasn’t a >mental case.
JDV,
A case of selective memory?
I am delighted to inform you that you should go back and re-read those
postings.
As you will see, as I myself admitted on my own -- quite truthfully and in a strightforward manner -- that since those whole attacks were FALSE to begin
with, I probably "overreacted" by asking for proofs and asking San to remove those anti-Ashu postings.
Please go back and re-read those.
Case closed.
Next?
*******************
>As for his comment that Suna and MRK should sort it out themselves, I’ve
>never heard anything funnier. Wasn’t it Ashu who brought the whole issue of
>his receiving hate-emails to the forum? If I remember correctly, he said he’d >rather talk it out here than engage in a battle of emails
JDV,
These are the facts.
I use my own name here.
I take full responsibility and bear all the risks for my postings.
I do NOT ask for special privilege or protections or for special community
standards here.
And I even defend the rights of my attackers to post stuff here.
Sure, you may not like my postings, and that's perfectly fine.
But you cannot deny the truth behind the above-four facts.
And, at the risk of laboring the obvious, as an active sajha dor comer, I value
this OPEN forum as a great peer-to-peer learning forum.
That is why, if someone -- anonymous or real-name posters -- provide better, more cogent arguments to my ideas and thoughts, I have no trouble modifying my ideas and learning from better people out there.
As for the "sorting out" issue, let me explain: I SUPPORT the freedom of speech of my anonymous attackers because, quite frankly, as a matter of strategy:
a) I love to trash their lies, lies and lies OPENLY and PUBLICLY and RELENTLESSLY without asking for proofs. This is what is called sorting issues out between them and myself in this PUBLIC forum WITHOUT asking for protections and WITHOUT asking for a third-party to do something for me. People are free to comment on
or NOT read those "sorting out" postings.
b) I enjoy taking my anonymous attackers lies, lies and lies and turning them
into verifiably true and honest and positive public relations campaign for
myself. My attackers thus do me a wonderful favor by attacking me. The
more they attack, the more elevated I feel. :-)
c) and, on a more visceral level, I guess, as a competitive person, I love driving these spineless attackers to sheer mental and physical exhaustion, slamming them, as it were, against some metaphorical cyber-walls.
Yes, it can be a bloody battle to defend oneself in public, but it's the truth that
is what that needs a defense. Plus, it's also great spectator sport for others. :-)
Anyway, JDV, this is what I have learnt and practiced, and would urge other
self-confident posters out there -- Suna et al -- to also take matters into their
own hands by assuming:
a) the full responsibilities and
b) the full risks
emanating from their participation in this OPEN-to-ALL forum.
The only way we can keep the attacks to a minimum is by using the verifiable truth, truth and truth relentlessly against the lies, lies and lies, and by using attacks against oneself to one's own advantage.
oohi
ashu
ktm,nepal
|
