| Username |
Post |
| Suman Dhakal |
Posted
on 04-Apr-02 03:42 PM
If the military takes over the country, the people should rally behind it. besides, what option do we really have? its either supporting the maoists or the military. i would pick the military any time. Once in power, they should go on a man hunt of prachanda and bhattarai. give them one last option for talks and if they still resist and want unresonable demands, get rid of them by any means necessary. once the military becomes sucessful on getting rid of these terrorists, it should focus on solving other problems, i.e. poverty, illetracy etc.
also, if all these corrupt congressi and communists start making too much noise, get rid of them. they have already destroyed the country and getting rid of them would only help solve the problem.
thus, give military a chance. Either in hopes that they might just turn the country around or because we simply don't have any other options.
Suman Dhakal
|
| Rumor |
Posted
on 04-Apr-02 04:25 PM
Hi,
NC and UML had done a series of destruction as well. They came into power by destroying all the bars in the sides of the streets in Kathmandu.
Needless to say that B.P. Koirala had given an order to hijack the plane to his “political kid, so what’s the difference between Maoist, NC, and UML. So, Nepalese people have to kick them out from the power. It can be alone done by RNA and RNA has a responsibility to restore any precise political system that guarantees Nepalese will.
Remember, I was a congressi, while I was in nepal. I lost trust to the NC leaders and I never had trust to UML-s.
|
| Rumor |
Posted
on 04-Apr-02 04:35 PM
Hi,
Does any one know where Padam Ratna Tuladhar is at this moment? Can we expect Padam to be a new prime minister, while RNA takes over? I am just curious about.
Any critics are welcomed....
|
| Suman Dhakal |
Posted
on 04-Apr-02 04:43 PM
I'm with you on this rumor. No political party in nepal is good enough to rule the country. it seems that nepal can only be saved by the king i.e. army. without the army, king is also helpless. gyanendra and the army should work something out between them. whats the purpose of the army? to save the country from internal or an external threat. right now, the threat is internal and if we don't resolve it soon enough, external threat is not out of the quesiton.
Suman Dhakal
|
| Suman Dhakal |
Posted
on 04-Apr-02 04:50 PM
if our country has seen 3 kings in a matter of a week, i don't seee any problem if gyanendra declars himself the prime minister. what does he do as a king anyway? don't need no padam ratna tuladhar. he can be the king and the prime minister.
Suman Dhakal
|
| Major Padam bdr kc |
Posted
on 05-Apr-02 12:37 AM
Army coup in Nepal, never expect it, it's never gonna happen kids.
Nepal army under constitution can never take that step.And if it happens, then you will surely witness the worse, count my words.
take care EVERYBODY
|
| SIWALIK |
Posted
on 05-Apr-02 02:18 PM
Obviously Suman does not understand the pitfall of army rule, eve though it might put up a good front. Power has its own dynamics. I would suggest you to see a movie that won academic nomination (c1997)and was based on real experience in Brazil. The name of the movie is: Four Days in September. Tell me if it changes your opinion after you see it.
|
| sparsha |
Posted
on 05-Apr-02 06:30 PM
siwalik,
are you a memb. of GAA (Gadsden Alumni Association)?
Binod ji ko kurum lettuce gang ho ki? just curious.
|
| Naya keta |
Posted
on 06-Apr-02 08:01 AM
Suman Dhakal is entitled to his opinions but I feel it unfortunate that he should have such opinions. I guess he has forgotten that just over 12 years ago the army did have a say in what happens in the country. In fact it has only been in the last 12 years that the army has relatively little say in the politics of the country. Before that they had been ruling for the last few hundred years and where did that get us. We are today considered one of the most backward countries in the world and I challenge anyone to say that it is because of the last 12 years. The army, by which I mean the Ranas and the thakuri (pardon the language) mf***ng BAHUSAABS deliberately kept society backward and the masses illiterate and ignorant so that they would have few problems ruling. Although it has become fashionable amongst the psuedo-intellectuals to use the last 12 years of democratic (mis)rule as a scape goat for the problems facing nepal, the fact is ,and something which i hear very few people admitting, is that the origins of the problems in Nepal today can be traced back to the feudalistic times of the Rana period, and in the manner in which they oppressed the masses and manipulated society only, and ONLY, for their OWN personal needs. These blood sucking human parasites prospered on the backs of the (almost slave) labor of the "sadharan Nepali". Why is that today, more than fifty years since their rule ended, we still find that a Rana "bahusaab" who basically does nothing all day everyday, except engage in his own trivial pursuits, is still more well off than a Nepali who has been working all his/her life, and whose ancestors as well had worked for all their lives....Can you possibly begin to imagine the amount of wealth that rightly belongs to Nepali people that these...these.....arrrggghhh....people..... have looted from us all? and the manner in which they did it?
These are the descendants of the SAME people who today control the army (not all Ranas and thakuris are like this ofcourse, and don't in any way mean to imply that they are).....see they never gave up control of the army in 51 because they knew that as long as they kept control of the (physical) power that the army represents no-one could take back any of this looted wealth...... and they have kept the army in their hands ever since. So for a person like Mr. Dhakal (no personal offense intended) to say that he thinks the army should take over is.....is ....sad....down right depressing, because it shows a lack of knowledge, or even worse, a complete denial of "REAL" Nepali history and the pain that had ben endured by ALL of the "sadharan Nepalis" of the past (our grandfathers and their granfathers and so on....). So to all of you out there who think that the army is the answer to our countries problems, please don't have a myopic view of history and see just the last 12 years, look at the last 200 years and then tell me if you still want the army to takeover.
|
| SIWALIK |
Posted
on 06-Apr-02 02:19 PM
Naya keta has a valid point. Nepal has its own "One Hundred Years of Solitude" as the root of present sorry condition!
No, I am not associated with GAA in any form or fashipn. I am a SEBSer!
|
| sparsha |
Posted
on 07-Apr-02 03:54 PM
Siwalik,
The person I knew was also a SEBSer but had joined GAA (GADSDEN Alumni Association) in Alabama later for a brief period of time.
Since you claim that you are not related to Gadsden Alumni Association (GAA) of any form or fashion, I should believe you. I SHOULD that is but..
I read your postings regularly and enjoy them.
sparsha
|
| SIWALIK |
Posted
on 08-Apr-02 01:28 PM
Hey, I am a part of that other cool GAA. T'was fun time in Bama, though brief. Still miss it so will come visiting with my wife in future. I remember that International Student Food Fest, and bunch of Nepal guys dancing on the stage.
So how's life? Miss you guys!
|
