| ashu |
Posted
on 08-Apr-01 03:01 PM
What are the options facing Girija? a) Negotiate first for blanket immunity and then resign. This way, he gets to keep all the Lauda loot and more. b) Resign and immediately flee the country, and spend the rest of his life enjoying his loot elsewhere. c) Ask the government to take back the Lauda case altogether, resign and then retire happily in Nepal. Nepali Congress, being intellectally and morally bankrupt as it is, will no doubt elevate him as a statesman. d) Cling on to the post; have the CIAA prove him to be corrupt; resign in disgrace and possibly go to jail. e) Cling on to the post; try to win the case against CIAA over technicalities, but preside over increasing chaos, mayhem and destruction . . . and finally have people rise against him in ways they did against Marich Man in 1990. My guess: Girija would choose option A -- both to save his face and to save his loot. Finally, those of you who were fooled by Mahesh Acharya's "moral" resignation a while ago: well, how moral was that resignation when Acharya seemed to have no moral qualms taking back his resignation upon Girija's urging? Acharya was just playing games. oohi ashu
|
| Biswo |
Posted
on 08-Apr-01 06:39 PM
Ashu, your options are based on the assumptions that there exists some mechanism to probe, and prosecute dishonest people like Girija in Nepal. Even if he resigns,UML or another faction of NC isn't going to prosecute him.Just as he never prosecuted anybody ,even those he termed to be corrupt , affiliated with previous governments. May be option d) is possible. But yet,he is not going to jail. The most likely scenario is e), and that's all you are going to see in the future.Or may be that's already the mirror of present day Nepal. " d) Cling on to the post; have the CIAA prove him to be corrupt; resign in disgrace and possibly go to jail. e) Cling on to the post; try to win the case against CIAA over technicalities, but preside over increasing chaos, mayhem and destruction . . . and finally have people rise against him in ways they did against Marich Man in 1990. "
|