| Username |
Post |
| Prashna |
Posted
on 03-Sep-02 10:12 AM
It's happened more than once. Each time the emergency was lifted from the capital, we've seen an increased level of anti social activities taking place. Everytime.
This makes me wonder. WHO gains from emergency? Who gains from imposing emergency in the capital? Whoever is behind these terrorist activities in Kathmandu, must benefit somehow.
All these things could be done when the emergency was on. can anybody guess who benefits from it?
|
| Satya |
Posted
on 03-Sep-02 10:33 AM
There is no doubt, government benefits because it gets excuse for another emergency. There is also a possibility that this kartus (bombing) is the work of the government.
|
| clear as day |
Posted
on 03-Sep-02 03:04 PM
I agree with you Comrade!
Of course the government and the king benefit from the emergency...that way they can rule for ever. There is strong evidence gathered by the RAW and CIA that actually Paras and his goons are behind the bombings and killings in Nepal. Maoist brothers would never kill living being...they are the true believers of peace and non-violence. They are so Buddhist that they don't even eat meat...vegetarians. So Paras causing all this mayhem in Nepal so that Gyanendra can impose the emergency.
If you don't believe me, visit the website of RAW and CIA.
|
| |
Posted
on 03-Sep-02 03:26 PM
you guys are so out of reality... maobadis will be soon be defaced from the face of earth..
|
