Sajha.com Archives
Negotiate or Not to Negotiate

   Folks, A continued military action wi 19-Sep-02 smr
     No solution is the best solution. Nei 19-Sep-02 virus


Username Post
smr Posted on 19-Sep-02 03:33 PM

Folks,

A continued military action without much international support and firepower will cost you lives, resources, and progress. A greater number of bright students, professionals and blue collar workers will leave the country; an unsettling situation will dry up our tourism and investments; urban pressure will intensify, crime will rise further. However, a successful campaign will hurt the Maoists movement for a long time. This will require a strong Indian support, I must add. Do you thing it is forthcoming? If not, should we then move on to the next option?

The option to negotiate will herald the Maoists as a potent political force, who must be satisfied with one or more of the following offers, secularism, republic state, and/or an elected constitutional assembly. What are we willing to give in here? What are the pros and cons of this option?

Throw in some more viable options (not just the wish list) and do your cost and benefit analysis. Or stick to these two and provide some insight. Also, remember that we have to take into account other players in this game: the Palace and the political parties. We may love or hate them. but their importance in solving the crisis cannot be ignored.

What will be the most logical and viable way to approach this so that we can have a long-run solution?
virus Posted on 19-Sep-02 06:56 PM

No solution is the best solution.

Neither India or Father of India could help us. Why do India has to help us? What do you return them?
You just say "Dhoti".

There is no solution in Nepal.
Jun deshma Raja marinchha tyaha arajakata hunchha hunchha.
Jasle bhrastachar garchha usle bhrastachar niyantran gardain gardaina.
Jo bideshma gayera study garera gyani banchha u Nepal farkeko bholipalta faint hunchha.

Aba hamro desh saprane kalpana garnu ghiu ko laddu man sita khanu ho.