| Prayas |
Posted
on 11-Oct-02 05:01 AM
At this time when there is lots of debate going about current action from king G, I would like to point out some of the misinterpretion people have been feeding throughout. Seems like everyone is talking about the rights and wrongs of constitution but what I got was unsatisfactory evaluation. All right .......so those who supports kings move says that he had to do it because Deuba tried to postpone the election and if he wasn't sacked he whould have been there for another years. But are people forgetting that we have democratic system and it is not possible to postpone election on his own?? Didn't he went to king with "urge" to postpone the election?? King could have refused it democratically and so other parties would have. So where does the justification of such unconstitutional act comes from? I am surprized that people still don't see how Nepal is being grinded between these Royals and Politicians. Just in another thread I read a posting from Kingbhakta where he says "it is not 17 saal, now the population is almost 2.2 times bigger and more educated". But do you think that makes any difference?? no.. comparing then and now okay population was less but so was network of Royals and politicians. So, people are more educated.... but do you see anyone with morale like Ganga lal, Dharma bhakta or Shukraraj?? If you browse you can see all the top posts of Army occupied by the ones with family connection with Royals. The conclusion is, No matter what you say we are not and have never been before free from the threat of herded back to autocracy like flock of sheeps... And if at the times like this if we support those unjustified terms just because we are fed up of few corrupted so called democrats, it would be much easier for anyone to fleece us up.
|
