| Username |
Post |
| rajunpl |
Posted
on 27-Jan-03 08:59 AM
Heart felt condolences for Mr/Mrs Shrestha.The conspiracy of royal incident foiling and banditism is flourishing.-rajunpl
MAIN THEORY:
Do you know what democracy means? or your gran or great gran knows? in context of nepal. Even if king or so called major politicians knows would bo wonder.
If there was a democracy in the palace, everyone would have the clear idea about the catastrophe.
If there was a democracy in the singhadurbar they wouldn't return to long experiace but no expreience monarchy.cos there is plenty of hypocrisy.They didn't invented democracy but derived it and they had the problem in derivation in context of nepal.That's why democracy always betray the nepalese citizen.
which king and major politicians could shows the diff. between the socialism and communism practically.
Maoist regime doing the same mistake Because Marx theory was bassed in 18th century industrial revolution.To reach in this quality of movement it's too early in our context.
You may have no idea that the british took over the new york city from dutch without a single gunfire in the past century.
You may fire million shot but not reach the target.Cos you giving no option and neither you deserve.
In the whole communist manifesto the conclusion of marx is defined as communism in term of violence. It was then not now.
Maoist can't claim democratic revolution in a violent way. Do you have another way?Neither do the congress or so so in a beaurocratic socialism way.
Normal citizen have never had the experiance the democracy cos they've always been in chaos,and led to catastrophe finally.
kathmandu has no time to think about his brother cities and village because it dance it stranger tune.
Why would king and major politicians give democracy to normal citizen when they never had their own? they are under alien but they will never confess it.
" Nepal is ever independent country" shame! shame!! how and when can you claim independent?It's better to be dominated by stranger rather than dominated by your nearest pal. It would be better to be under british rather than ranas regime.
They are hypocratic.they'd never give birth to democray . Monarchy system,communism,socialism and whatever ism comes'd never live in harmony. I f they do so they'd get the smell of d.e.m.o.c.r.a.c.y.
we may expect for the partial democracy if we are able to demolish the real demons, but never expect for the absolute democract cos its out of our system,virus will never let them in.
Only socialism cannot be democracy neither does communism but it can be possible aftermath the demolishion of autocracy,aristocracy and the beaurocracy
CONCLUSION:
If any one has to rule nepal transparent policy and the transparent practise.But, if the old feudal have to take power again they have to pay the upfront for the democracy only you can dream abou the new nepal otherwise legend will never end.
|
| Nepe |
Posted
on 27-Jan-03 11:05 PM
Interesting musing. Original style. Do keep up, hajur.
|
| Jhilke Kyailan |
Posted
on 28-Jan-03 02:45 AM
"CONCLUSION:
If any one has to rule nepal transparent policy and the transparent practise.But, if the old feudal have to take power again they have to pay the upfront for the democracy only you can dream abou the new nepal otherwise legend will never end."
You have an interesting thesis, but the fact that you are still talking about someone RULING Nepal kind of leads me to the fact that you may not really understand what it is you are talking about........Nepal doesn't need anyone to RULE...Nepal needs to be GOVERNED and there is a great difference between the two. It is a differnce of the political mindset. Rulers rule for ultimately for themselves, those who govern do it for the people. It is not the difference between democracy, capitalism, communism, socialism, autocracy, aristocracy etc...that plagues Nepal. It is the belief that a Govenment is for ruling and not for governing.....only when the differnce between these two concept is understood by not just the political leaders but also the "janta"as you and me that we will start progressing and then, it wont matter which system we have.
|
| sajan |
Posted
on 28-Jan-03 12:47 PM
Dear rajuNPL and Jhilke Kyailan !
Pragmatic dispute over pertinent topic. It puts me under compulsion to add few more words here.
Though its' not a matter of rule or ruling transparently its' a matter of attitudes of honest leaders who attempt to govern the Himalayan Kingdom. An existing attititudes and demeanour on these leaders are not very much sufficient to govern the Himalayan Kingdom ammaculately.
That's why its' happeing at all the times. I do hope it'll singals bit of picturesque about the prevalent democracy in the Himalayan Kingdom.
However it will be my great pleasure to have comments on it generously.
Good bye !
Sajan
|
| SITARA |
Posted
on 28-Jan-03 03:03 PM
Lau na Nepe ji...
Do I detect a tad bit of "hajur-esque" amusement? :P
|
