| Username |
Post |
| Nayabhingey |
Posted
on 08-Feb-03 07:16 PM
Dear people and saan da maan. I spoke with Rastaman and he asked me to tell the people about Rastaman.He said that Sajha has become boring and can see people writing that. Rastaman says that lots of people accused him of all sorts of things so he asked me to represent him in your court before all the people that opposed him. He says that since people have seen him he wants them to prove or bring their points against him. He says he is not going to write in Sajha anymore anyways. He says that since he had been writing people should be able to prove his integrity. I will put exactly as he told me.
Dear peopal here I is askin you and dem to prove that I is not what I is sayin.
1. Rastaman is a simple man
2. Rastaman does not eat meat
3. Rastaman loves his (wife/girlfriend) and never leave her for other women
4. Rasta considers alcohol his no.1 enemy
5. Rasta believes in truth and nothin else
6. Rastaman loves all peopal including them peopal
7. Rastaman is very religious
There is them mo but dont want to bore peopal. Anyways since you knows I from my writings just prove I that I is not any one of them. Rasta always speak da truth.
Rasta is not going to monopolize or write anything beside replying to peopal in this above matter
So this is what he told me.
Thank you
|
| suva chintak |
Posted
on 08-Feb-03 07:41 PM
You da man, Rasta!
Welcome back and I hope you will not stay longer. I think Sajhapurians are willing to revoke your exile sentence...if King G can lift the terrorist tag on dem Prachanda and Baburam, Sajha should respond in like gesture and lift the red corner notice on Rastaman.
Spread mo of dat lov!
|
| khukuree |
Posted
on 08-Feb-03 08:27 PM
beside being a simple man, i'm totally opposite of this guy.
i need meat everyday.
i love both my wife and girlfriend and will leave once in a while to get some poontang
alcohol is my best friend.
i believe nothing and nobody.
i love all people excluding dem people.
i'm so not religious....we created god.
tell rasata to came back mr. bhingey, the messanger.
oohi
hasta man gurung
|
| Montou |
Posted
on 08-Feb-03 09:20 PM
Hey Hasta Man dai,
You said, "i'm so not religious....we created god."
Could you elaborate this or enlighten me on this. So do you believe the whole universe and everything in it was result of a Big-Bang?
By His Grace,
Montou
|
| Nayabhingey |
Posted
on 08-Feb-03 10:21 PM
Hello friends again on behalf of Rastaman I would like to let you know that Rastaman do not want anything else here like big bang orsmall bang. I think Rasta was just trying to say something and it is going like big and small bang. Please ask san da man. Rasta would like you to respect his points and go only to the point that rastaman wants to talk.
Thank you
|
| cardinal |
Posted
on 09-Feb-03 02:42 AM
Haha, I am glad that after being outcasted from sajha, Rastaman finally realised how wonderful sajha is and wants to have a 'safe landing' back to sajhaland. Well, I do hope you realise ur mistakes before coming back and expect people to embrace u.
Sajha rules!
|
| juniormarvin |
Posted
on 10-Feb-03 06:58 PM
Hey them cardinal what is you talkin "bout? Rasta commited a mistake heya ? oh I see I did because Rasta do not speak , write ,or stand like them in theya themocratic forum. Oh I and I got it now. That was da mistake made by Rasta. Them peopal neva embrace I because them admin said if I change I then them will embrace I. Ask he. That was da condition him gave I and I neva accused no one . This is how them works my broda. Yes I agree dat Sajha rules exactly like in da kingdom. Just shut them up lock them up if them dont agree with . How come you speak so true my broda. I knows that Sajha rules as you say and them is ruling. Them ruled against I cause I neva agree wid them peopal. I neva change my rasta way to come into their themocratic way. Yes you is right Sajha rules. Maybe I have to stand up like them used to do before da begining of da movie in da kingdom. How true my broda.
|
| surya |
Posted
on 10-Feb-03 08:28 PM
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
that my friends, was how long it took my eyes to roll back into my head! :)
|
| DWI |
Posted
on 10-Feb-03 10:03 PM
I did oppose to the Rastaman earlier. But I think being a free site, Rasta should be allowed in. My vote.
|
| czar |
Posted
on 10-Feb-03 11:07 PM
“Acceptable Use Policy” is a doctrine commonly used for the management for networks and for forums like sajha. This defines what kind of activity is allowed in a network and/or web site. The moment the letter or spirit of such is violated, the transgressors are very quickly shown the exit. As the Borg declare: "Resistance is futile.”
What is acceptable for one is unacceptable for another and that is often subject to debate. Ultimately, what prevails is the judgment exercised by the management/owner of the network and/or web site.
Sajha.com is a privately owned entity. Which part of ‘private’ are some still struggling with I wonder? To elucidate the point, consider that San can put a stick of dynamite into the server and light a match this July 4th if he so pleases. He can even do it for his birthday. Does that clarify the issue as to who calls the shots on this web site?
It is astounding that this is still being debated. That San even allows this discussion to be opened is a testimony to his generosity and goodwill. Those that are still carping on the issue are abusing his generosity and testing his patience.
There are some that want to debate every issue to death. Rasta and his ilk found out that there are exceptions. In plain speak: the subject is NOT open to endless debate. Take it or leave it.
And do spare us the sanctimonious spluttering about free speech and holier than thou sermons. Sure, we know that some of you are more Catholic than the Pope too.
|
| whine and chij |
Posted
on 11-Feb-03 09:21 AM
does anyone really need anymore convincing after this punk has the gall to come back here with the exact same attitude that got him booted in the first place? you can take the jerk out of the chicken, but you cannot take the chicken out of the jerk.
|
| suva chintak |
Posted
on 11-Feb-03 01:33 PM
Mercy, Mercy!
Let us have him back...If we don't like him we can just skip his postings! Come on Rasta, show us what you have got this time!
Let a thousand flowers bloom (we can always choose which ones to take home)!
|
| whine and chij |
Posted
on 11-Feb-03 02:08 PM
same approach as was used with the maoists, sc.
|
| juniormarvin |
Posted
on 11-Feb-03 03:17 PM
Yo them whine. Stop yo whinin and start talkin. What have you got agains I? All you and them dont like is I and Is attitued and Language. I and I told you It is who I is. If them wants to change I to be able to coma heya then theres somethin wrong wid them. Do you gets that? And as for Czar. What perosn would call hisself by that name and say them is for Democracy? You sure can write betta english than I and longa than I but you still have them attitude of them king ruling ova I and I. I neva call no body no punk and use them obscene good english language in this themocratic forum. Yo Czar you is askin them to be da czar and banish I. Sush my soul? Yeah I unnerstan that you sayin them can do anything like banishing peopal from da private site and stuff like dat and still call themselves democratically correct. You is da Czar and you them got that attude. You probably da royal dude or them ministers of da king.
|
| whine and chij |
Posted
on 11-Feb-03 04:23 PM
keep your pus-filled ideas comin' outta your smack mouth. i'll be more than happy to slap your phony rasta schtick down, EVERY jahdamn time.
|
| NK |
Posted
on 11-Feb-03 04:48 PM
Should I defend my cause celebre?? Hmm... hmm....
Hmmm... Rastaman, you *are* annoying. You *do* annoy the hell outta me and many other. But what I say is let's be consistent. If you are to be exiled yet another time, few others who have "puss-filled ideas" and 'puss-filled' mouth should be begone too! No?
|
| suva chintak |
Posted
on 11-Feb-03 04:53 PM
NK, I am with you on this one!
|
| NK |
Posted
on 11-Feb-03 04:57 PM
teita bhanya suva chintak. what about those who don't hesitate to call names?kinda like guerillla attack. talk about "maoist approach." No, accountability whatsoever. You vomita and leave the place. Whine and chij, rings a bell?
|
| SITARA |
Posted
on 11-Feb-03 05:22 PM
I do recall adjectives being hurled.... without rhyme nor reason; personal, vicious attacks as well!
Wouldn't you call that obnoxious (beyond annoying or irritating) behaviour?
|
| SITARA |
Posted
on 11-Feb-03 05:26 PM
NK... some "puss-filled mouth" did call you a pretty term of endearment, no????
hmmmmmmm.... Interesting how we judge and get judged!
|
| surya |
Posted
on 11-Feb-03 06:49 PM
Though I'd chronicle the evolution of an original phrase that now seems to have degenerated to something else...
*pus-filled ideas ... smack mouth (w&c)
*puss-filled ideas... and... 'puss-filled' mouth (nk)
*puss-filled mouth...(Sitara)
Ahem... puss or pus?
|
| bhedo |
Posted
on 11-Feb-03 07:00 PM
lol@puss. Puss is a dirty word. I sure would want my mouth to be filled with puss....
|
| NK |
Posted
on 11-Feb-03 07:52 PM
Sitara, tell me about it!
see you in 'haiku and poem' thread, la? :)
|
| whine and chij |
Posted
on 11-Feb-03 08:03 PM
not to put anyone on de-spot, but who was it who launched an ad hominem attack against the site admin, got called on it, then backpedalled furiously rather than face accountability?
as for your "not so fresh" feeling, don't worry, monistat and vagisil aren't on the list of recalled drugs.
|
| whine and chij |
Posted
on 11-Feb-03 08:08 PM
"well" wisher...yeah, riiight.
just ignore me and i go away, so sez you.
|
