Sajha.com Archives
Stupid question

   This poll recently appeared on a men's i 16-Feb-03 bill_pusateri
     Hi Bill, Don't be offended with this 16-Feb-03 Harris
       Is the discussion-- about some "stupid" 16-Feb-03 M.P.
         Hya, M.P. pani 16-Feb-03 Harris
           aani bho..world ko present crisis ma mas 16-Feb-03 forget-me-not
             Gentlemen (I hope the ladies are not lis 16-Feb-03 suva chintak
               1 17-Feb-03 JackAss
                 We must continue asking "stupid" questio 17-Feb-03 bewakoof
                   Suva_chintak, yours is very interesting 17-Feb-03 cardinal


Username Post
bill_pusateri Posted on 16-Feb-03 05:46 PM

This poll recently appeared on a men's issue site, Men's Stuff.org. I repeat. "While Wearing Jockey Shorts, Do Men Pee Through the Fly-Hole, Over the Top, or Under the Leg?" I ask, Why does it make any difference; is it a question of universal importance considering the current state of the world?
Harris Posted on 16-Feb-03 06:00 PM

Hi Bill,

Don't be offended with this question. It should be a good business question for producers of men's underwear. You see by eliminating the fly-hole, it could be saved a fraction of current cost of production (less materials required, less cutting and threading etc. etc.). Suppose 80% of men pee over the top, then why shouldn't the fly-hole be eliminated at all? You will get your underwear 6 for 10 instead of 5 for 10 now. If majority of the men pee under the leg, then the tight legs should be relaxed to give more comfort. All the productions are for comfort, economy and satisfaction. Afterall, underwear holds the second most (for some one it is the first one) important asset of men after their brain. Ki kaso?
M.P. Posted on 16-Feb-03 06:01 PM

Is the discussion-- about some "stupid" poll question that appeared on a random site-- of any universal importance considering the current state of the world?

My one and the only posting for this topic.
Harris Posted on 16-Feb-03 06:06 PM

Hya, M.P. pani
forget-me-not Posted on 16-Feb-03 06:42 PM

aani bho..world ko present crisis ma masko ramro dscussion..keep it up...;)
suva chintak Posted on 16-Feb-03 08:06 PM

Gentlemen (I hope the ladies are not listening, this is supposed to be men's talk)!

The pollster seems to have omitted one important sociological fast - an important segment of the male population does not do it under, through or over the underwear because they simply don't wear an underwear. They see it as too much of an unnecessary impediment to their freedom of mobility.

So, the barons of the underwear industry might reap significant expansion in their existing markets if they can devise appealing ways to bring these 'live free or die' fanatics under their cover, literally!

A very unscientific poll of my own. While dressing for the day, you suddenly discover that you have used up all your clean undies. How do you typically resolve this crisis?

1. dig out the cleanest from the laundry pile
2. parole the guy for the day
3. borrow your gf's/w's

This will be held strictly confidential!
JackAss Posted on 17-Feb-03 02:16 PM

1
bewakoof Posted on 17-Feb-03 02:53 PM

We must continue asking "stupid" questions, especially considering the current state of the world. Remember, we cannot let the terrorists win by changing our behaviour. So I say to one and all, continue indulging in your asnine, titillating, base, inconsequential discussions. Otherwise the terrorists win.
cardinal Posted on 17-Feb-03 05:43 PM

Suva_chintak, yours is very interesting poll.

my vote: 1.

but what i usually do is always have a clean and new one for special purposes and go for option 2 rather than using that one. For general purposes I go with option 1.