| whoever |
Posted
on 06-Jun-01 01:01 PM
It appears there is a new spin to the tragic events of Friday, June 1st. The Washington Post reports the events of the evening as told by a relative of a Royal family member who witnessed the events. (see: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/world/A25279-2001Jun5.html). There is also a posting on this website from Ashu who posted an email supposedly written by an ADC of Dipendra. (see: http://www.gbnc.org/FORUM/CFM/OpenThread.cfm?forum=2&ThreadID=944). Both these postings point to Dipendra as the lone gunman who gunned down the king and the rest of the royal family before shooting himself. They both also directly or indirectly indicate that Paras had nothing to do with the shootings.
Other reports of the same chain of events have also been reported to relatives of people who were in the palace at the time of the shootings.
The question I have is: Did the events unfold exactly as described in these reports and the palace is now slowly releasing the information so people could digest it? Or, is this another step in the consiparcy? People (royal family members and others) could have been forced to tell this story to the media and thier relatives so that this version of the story gets out into the general public. Just a thought.
|
