| Username |
Post |
| czar |
Posted
on 01-Mar-03 03:34 PM
Convicted killer’s transplant sparks ethical debate
Many argue inmate is not entitled to donated liver
ASSOCIATED PRESS
YORK, Neb., Feb. 28 — Farmer Calvin Stock’s life was saved by a liver transplant three years ago, and he would hate to see anyone else lose their chance at survival because a convicted killer was ahead of them on the transplant list. But that’s exactly what could happen because of a Nebraska inmate’s conditional approval to be included on the list of 17,300 people nationwide waiting for new livers.
http://www.msnbc.com/news/878794.asp?cp1=1#BODY
|
| bhedo |
Posted
on 01-Mar-03 03:48 PM
No comment this time eh?
|
| czar |
Posted
on 01-Mar-03 03:51 PM
Cause some folks get confused real easy.
|
| bhedo |
Posted
on 01-Mar-03 03:53 PM
Either that or the guy writing the comment gets confused himself.
|
| czar |
Posted
on 01-Mar-03 04:07 PM
Quod Erat Demonstratum
|
| bhedo |
Posted
on 01-Mar-03 04:22 PM
You perfectly know it that I caught your non sequitur. Call me confused, or tell Sitara to make room in her class, but you haven't explained yourself. Oops, my bad, I forgot, "food for thought" is your explanation. What was I thinking? Truly does make me the fool.
|
