| curious |
Posted
on 06-Jun-01 05:15 PM
No matter how many versions come out, it seems like Dipendra is to blame. Let's think about this, what other versions can there be? Let's count out the involvement of any other national interests. Where does that leave us? The royal family themselves. So either Dipendra did it or someone in the Royal family did it. Whoever did it is ruthless enough to kill 9 people of the royal family so why would any surviving witness risk their own lives and the lives of their family by 'ratting' on this killer if he/she exists. Plus if the person is ratted upon, the Royal Family is going to be history because the public will not take it. Maybe fearing the end of thier regime, the royal family even the ones who survived have enough reason to not tell the truth.
|
