Sajha.com Archives
Fake beginnings of Islam

   The Moon had split into two distinct par 08-Mar-03 Biruwa
     An ancient Islamic fanatic (one of the o 08-Mar-03 Biruwa
       LORD RAMA Lord Rama is the central char 08-Mar-03 Biruwa
         Read Ramayan ek Operation.....Ramayan is 09-Mar-03 Biratnagare
           Hi Biratnagare, What I was trying to 10-Mar-03 Biruwa


Username Post
Biruwa Posted on 08-Mar-03 01:03 PM

The Moon had split into two distinct parts in front of their very eyes. The two parts had separated and receded so much apart from each other that to the on-lookers (in Makkah) one part had appeared on one side of the mountain and the other on the other side of it. Then, in an instant the two had rejoined. This was a manifest proof of the truth that the system of the universe was neither eternal nor immortal, it could be disrupted.

This incident indicated that huge stars and planets could split asunder, disintegrate, collide with each other, and everything that had been described in the Qur'an on the Resurrection could happen. The Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) invited the people's attention to this event only with this object in view and asked them to mark it and be a witness to it. But the disbelievers described it as a magical illusion and persisted in their denial. They were reproached in Surah Al-Qamar (The Moon) for their stubbornness.

It is due to this incident about their king, the people of Malabar became the first community in India to accept Islam.


“There is a very old tradition in Malabar, South-West Coast of India, that Chakrawati Farmas, one of their kings, had observed the splitting of the moon, the celebrated miracle of the Holy Prophet (pbuh) at Mecca, and learning on inquiry that there was a prediction of the coming of a Messenger of God from Arabia, he appointed his son as regent and set out to meet him. He embraced Islam at the hand of the Prophet, and when returning home, at the direction of the Prophet, died at the port of Zafar, Yemen, where the tomb of the “Indian king” was piously visited for many centuries.”


Was that indian prince killed for refusing to convert to Islam?
Biruwa Posted on 08-Mar-03 01:10 PM

An ancient Islamic fanatic (one of the original propounder of Muslim dharma!) said:

My follower will be a man circumcised, without a tail (on his head), keeping beard, creating a revolution, announcing call for prayer and will be eating all lawful things. He will eat all sorts of animals except swine. They will not seek purification from the holy shrubs, but will be purified through warfare. Because of their fighting the irreligious nations, they will be known as Musalmans (Muslims). I shall be the originator of this religion of the meat-eating nation."
Biruwa Posted on 08-Mar-03 01:23 PM

LORD RAMA
Lord Rama is the central character to the Epic RAMAYAN (whose author was Valmiki) Rama is the son of Dasharath, the king of Banaras. Dasharath had three wives, kaushalya, kaikeyi and Smitra besides several hundreds concubines.

According to the Ramayana, Rama spent most of his life trying to save his wife, Sita from the clutches of Ravan At the same time Rama was enjoying life to the full at every opportunity.


HOW RAMA WAS FOOLED BY SUKRIEVAN
When god Rama was exiled to the forest together with his wife, sukrievan appeared as deer and fooled god Rama. Although Rama was a "god", he was not able to see through Sukreivan's disguise!


12 YEARS FOR RAMA, BUT ONE DAY TO RAVAN
To retrieve his wife from Devil Ravan, god Rama sought the help of Hanuman, a monkey god. Hanuman agreed to help Rama bring his wife back on condition that god Rama in turn help him (Hanuman) to kill his twin brother prior to undertaking the mission.

I took more than twelve years for Hanuman to build a bridge and accomplish the task while Ravan just took Sita and flew to Sri lanka in just one day's time Where is the bridge that Rama built?? Who is more powerful - God Rama or Devil Ravan ? Would a god seek the help of another god to murder a third god?

* If Hanuman could fly carrying big mountains, he should have in the first instance carried and flown god Rama to Sri Lanka, which would have resulted in early rescue of Sita.

* Who knows what Ravan might have done to Sita during this period of twelve years? Definitely a devil would have done only "devilish" things!

Before helping god Rama, Hanuman made Rama shoot his own twin brother in the back and only then did Hanuman help god Rama How can a "god" indulge in such a criminal act for personal gain?



BEEF EATING RAMA
When God Rama was told to go to forest, he mournfully revealed to is mother: "if has been ordained that I have to lose the kingdom, forego the princely comforts and the tasty, MEAT DISHES. (Ayodha Kandam, 20, 26, 94th Chapters).



RAMA'S MANY WIVES
Mr. C.R. Sreenivasa lyengar's translation of Valmiki Ramayana says: " Though Rama had married Sita to be the queen, he married many other wives for sexual pleasure in accordance with the royal customs. (Ayodha Kandam 8th Chapter, page 28).
(The term "Rama's wives" as been used in many places in Ramayan).


RAMA'S DISRESPECT FOR HIS FATHER
Rama called his father " A FOOL, AN IDIOT" (Ayodhya Kandam, 53rd Chapter).


RAMA'S CONTEMPT FOR WOMEN & LOW CASTES
Rama disfigured and mutilated many women by cutting off her noses, breasts, ears etc., and tortured them (Soorpanaki, Ayomuki).

source: http://www.geocities.com/indiafas/Hindu/islam_in_hindu_scriptures.htm
Biratnagare Posted on 09-Mar-03 03:04 AM

Read Ramayan ek Operation.....Ramayan is full of so much contradictory bullcraps
Biruwa Posted on 10-Mar-03 10:22 AM

Hi Biratnagare,

What I was trying to point out by publishing this sorry fabrication of the great epic Ramayan was that people stop at nothing in trying to undermine other people's beliefs.
Their own mohammad was a child molester (A fact reported by kuran etc.) and yet they trying to pick up dirt on other's religion!

Look- Believe in what you want. We are not stopping you. But why do you need to distort facts in your own mind about our culture.

Ram was described as "Maryada purusotam" in Ramayan. None of the true hindu epics describe him as having many wives. Infact he was heralded as He who respected his wife. Infact it is specially written that he had Sita as his wife and none other. Yet muslims (ignorant of this fact) rant on and on with a single narrow mind about trying to slander our Gods so that our faith can be weakened.

They try to sow deviation in our minds and thus destroy our spirituality. Alas, they are much mistaken. For what do they know about spirituality? What of fairness? They are themselves lost!