| Username |
Post |
| sparsha |
Posted
on 28-Mar-03 06:13 AM
Ladies and gentleman,
Coming soon! Coming soon! A new nautanki is coming soon in our nation.
Krishna Mahara a staunch Maoist- says "King must create atmosphere for talks" [nepalnews.com 3/28/03] and Girija the president of a party, which is a loyal supporter of constitutional monarchy- says "NC for Republican state if King fails to revive Constitution"[nepalnews.com 3/28/2003].
Girija is truly a Nautanki hero. He should be given an award - a juttako mala perhaps-for his regular yet firm commitment to the political nautanki arena. He seems to lead all the nautanki heroes out there.
Are not there enough NC supporters who can shout at this wacky nautanki hero to "shut up"? Is Girija a hukumi jarnel? Whatever he says should be a defending statement for NC?
If Girija wants a republic state that's fine with me. But I want him to stick with what he says. He goes to the King one day and does a swasti and comes back, couple of days later he talks about grand design, then he says his party is committed to the constitutional monarchy among other things, talks about "samuhik darshanbhet" and goes alone to see the King, then again he comes out one day and says NC for republican state if king fails to revive Constitution. He talks about reviving the constitution - the Constitution he rarely understood, it seems to me. I doubt GPK truely understood the "marma" of the Constitution of which he seems to give "duhai" now.
Maoists want to have talk with the king ["Mahara said final talks to resolve issues will be with the King"], UML may come to the power with significant role [UML does not talk about republican state the way GPK does, interestingly] and NC's nautanki boss talks about republican state. This is merely a cheap bargain for political advantage. GPK's party was given mandate twice [had majority in the parliament] to govern and each time instead of focusing on addressing the issues of the nation his poor leadership created an internal rift and collapsed. Afno aang ko hatti dekhnu chhaina aarka ko aang ko jumra dekhne!
I am sick of this lousy leader and his nautanki leadership. I also deeply resent all these hundreds of thousands of NC loyalists who keep following this pipalpate nautanki.
|
| RAJUNPL |
Posted
on 28-Mar-03 06:44 AM
I am not surprised.Heraing that.
(a)Division of the NSP.
(b) GPK demanding republic state
(c) UML's colateral speeches/behave towards the king
(d) Indian ambassidor mercy on the king followed by the multy party system.
If you look at the solid evidence of the history, which leader you found loyal to the nation.CHAIR-RACE is the fact that makes the leader(GPK) saying the unusual words to the media.The king visit to india in a short while already brought many hoaxes.The influential aricles made for the king in the indian news-media are not again the surprising elements.
You can see here the king G is not like king M.Another element of demanding nepal as REPUBLICAN STATE by GPK is laughable subject as well.
Now, are UML seeking or fore-looking for the kingdom..?while their principle doesn't allow if they are true communist..?The random political movement of nepal is pushing NEPALESE DEMOCRACY in the ditch again.The unpredicted and irrevelant demands by the political leaders is nothing more than catastrophe to the nation.
SPARSHA: I am sick of this lousy leader and his nautanki leadership. I also deeply resent all these hundreds of thousands of NC loyalists who keep following this pipalpate nautanki.
Well, like people choose their faith,they have to choose the party,They could be influenced by the party policy,but not by the solo-politics-leader.In the far-reaching-consequence and to see the "freedom and justice" in the country.One could be loyalist and lay their life for the party but not for the single leader.LIke NCP, there are many other parties likeCPN-UML/ML,RPP,RSP,MAOIST,ROYALIST.One could be royalist but not like the king GYANENDRA.
Even if you see in the US,people may not kike the BUSH but they laying their life for the REPUBLICAN.
|
| sparsha |
Posted
on 28-Mar-03 07:25 AM
Rajunpl,
Well, seems like we are talking more or less on the same frequency...
UML is not a communist party, no! not to me. The word "communist" is embedded there just because that magic word has been interestingly powerful enough to exploit the sentiment of "poor" people. If they drop that word then what's there to distinguish them from NC?
I have not seen any firm committment from any political parties so far for the people and the nation. Still, they are focusing on the chair in singhdurbar.
Nepal truly lacks People's party.
In the US, at least cross-party voting is not a rare or prohibited practice. Ofcourse, the US is not an ideal example of poltical environment but the system is pretty stable here. We should determine what is good for us rather than focusing on how things are working in other places. We certainly can learn from others' experiences but should be real careful before thinking of copying others.
|
| rajunpl |
Posted
on 29-Mar-03 02:21 AM
Well,There is no harm choosing and believing own faith and party.I am also not the one that is influenced by the foreign party.Being a human you cannot hide the coparative fact.
There was a colateral armment in ROYAL PALACE and peace in four ends of the country.But the situation now is bilateral if you know what i mean.UML is not a communist party...!!! Which one is the...?.Sometime I think we are fool enough to anticipate the big outcome from that short period of the restored democracy.Our leader is not experienced and neither hold the foresightedness.
The impact of the foreign loan looted by the king and the "eastablishment" has ranked out of even the thirld world.The GDP per capita is somewhat like a first class citizen of west spend in a party.Like you said communist is sentiment of the poor people.It is indeed.
When there was a Starvation,loot,prejudiece trial,Oppression by the eastablishment.There born a communism.I myself see the BIRTH AND DEATH OF COMMUNISM by the uprising and downfall of it in the second world.
KRISHNA MAHARA his attempt to solve the insurgent and govt. problem by talk in the first place is welcomable and praiseworthy.Though there is no response by the king like the old GPK authority.As we have seen in the past the failure of dialogue was to blame for the authority not for the ultra-leftist.
The demand of GPK again made the nepalese citizen to think.I wonder if he was there when they drafted the constitution under the const. monarchy.
|
