We can barely find living symbol of love in today's sophisticated world. But once in the while in fursad I siit and think of LOVERS who make a history. If you guys were to rate the symbol of love who you would vote. After lots of brainstroming choice is RADHA KRISHNA.

Our unfortunate western world don't know shit about R-K, rather they justify for the couple of Shake's fantasy.

This is the ideal, but not often possible. In todays lifestyle people easly fall under the spell of their sexual attraction immediately, Still if you look beyond it for other keys to compatibility.
For instance, one of these is laughter.
Laughter tells you how much you will enjoy each others company over the long term.
If your laughter together is good and healthy, and not at the expense of others, then you have a healthy relationship to the world. Laughter is the child of surprise. If you can make each other laugh, you can always surprise each other. And if you can always surprise each other, you can always keep the world around you new.

Pisces, That's how I measure myself.

As far as my knowledge of Hinduism goes, Radha and Krishna did have a sexual relationship. That's what Raas Lila was all about -- Radha and Krishna making love in the woods.

Let me do MoneyMinded impression

Did you guys know.............Krishna our great god had AIDS.........that is right peoples.....Krishna had so many gopinis to fool around..................He must have AIDS.......Do you know how lord Krishna died.........He died when the blood flowing from his thumb wouldn't Clot............HIV did that people...

I went to biggest Krishna temple in India.........because I am a historian.........and that is what I find.

(Sorry couldn't resist)

hahaha kiddo,

bro did u know AIDS was transfered from a monkey, once upon a time in Africa, a guy got so horny that he decided to fk a monkey, and he got AIDS..and thats how it started..that guy made all of our life misreable..:P, thats the truth tho..beilive it or not

I didn't start this thread to make fun of radha and krishna. kiddo needless to talk to you coz i believe you don't understand at all. And Miss SimpleGal there is no clue of sexual relation between Radha and Krishna in any Krishna Charitra. Raas Lila was that extreme of divine love where Radha and Krishna became one. Answer to Kiddo,,, Gopinis were devotee, they all had just loved krishna and Gopis had Maharaas with Krishna. Matter of fact, Maharaas doesn't mean having sex with all those gopinis , its that point Gopis reached the BHAKTI BHAV. Either way, radha or gopis they all had loved the krishna. Maharaas . Its our misfortune that we are so able to twist and turn thing and think other way around but we just refused to understand what lies beneath. Just think beyond what you see in surface.

Dude lets talk about radha and krishan.............we believe that krishna is god..........for me he is not.............he is clever dude..............which art of maupultaing things but he got some power ...............he was mediator in that world for the powerful nation..............he was a bill clinton of mahabharta time.....................and the fact also is he is dark like koila thats why they made his pic blue.............................................for radha raslila...........he was actually sleeping with lots of gopins.............and he is indeed a big time play boy..........i was checking one of the pic in kamasutra , i saw he was in chariot of naked gopinis and having sex with radha on top...................so he can be absolute charmer who know how to pls god.................mira went crazy in his love and devotion..............actually the way he died is mystery as well but they say he was killed by hunter thinking he is deer............it is only the relegious writer who is saving his ass.............infact he was dead of mysterious diesase................but he was great guy.............who encourge to fight pandava................he knew what he was doing.............

onething i know is he show the basic nature of man...............who says love u r wife and still have gf..........who knows how to balance the baharwali and andarwali...............there love between each other was superb......................lot of things about his miracle are all bullshit ..................except some story from mahabharat battle.............if u read bhagwad gita u can find it is manupulted...........do u know his kingdom ..............dwarkia still exist under water in india...........and they have found poutrey and city inside...........

One thing only i can say is krishna and radha existed and he is a example of eternal love..........but he never married to radha.

sorry guys some typing mistakes.

which art of ................should be with art of
poutrey and city inside........... should be artifacts

Pisces wrote:
>>>Raas Lila was that extreme of divine love where Radha and Krishna became one<<<<

"Becoming one" is a jargon used by the so-called "divinitists" for sexual intercourse. It is because of this form of double-talk and vagueness that's misleading many young people into what sex is and is not and hence the proliferation of the AIDS epidemic among them!

In peace.

Ok... this thread is the best I have read in terms of accidental humor!!!!!!!

Kiddo, that was hilarious! No disrespect to Krishna and Krishna bhaktas. Hemophilia is another disease that prevents blood from clotting.

S Gal: "The UNION" is like the ONION: Layered! hehe!

on the Onion:
The kiwi and the onion,
went for a bike ride.
"Why?" lamented the kiwi,
do I tickle you, But, you make me cry?"



Sorry Pisces, couldn't resist it! My symbol of love is, Ying and Yang Union!
S Gal, I hope you won't accuse them of having sex! :P

In Sanskrit, the word is maithuna, which basically means unification.
Then you have something else they call HASTHA-MAITHUNA. It's an ancient art that people practice(particularly men) even to this day!

I am not sure if Lord Krishna of RAMAYAN had AIDS .

But I am sure modern day gangbang was originated from MAHABHARATA .

You guys should watch video of Panch Pandavas jointly involved in sexual intercourse with lonely Dropadi .

^True...Arjun would thrust his manliness in her cunt..while Yudhistera would bust a load in her mouth...Bhima would give her the business from behind....and Nakul and Sadave, resourceful as ever, would each grab her breast and proceed to titty-hump her....

K bhayo.....sajha ma aaj kaal.....started with simple question of Who is the greatest "premi premika" and ended up in "raas lila" of Draupadi with his five husbands with a picture perfect explanation of who went what way to get the satisfaction.....

Sajha is great.....

RAM PRASAD

aah u mean the color range in the monitor//eeh! no sound either...hmm as kalanki suggested definetly try for drivers....ok now i understnad ur question,,but u sud have given more info..like what kind of windows r u using and other craps??

haha ok ur welcomed..in advanced

ooh shit wrong post! am very sorry guys..


hahaha this post is getting halarious..dude, moneyminded ur concept is definetly khatra..have u ever thought of publishing a book??

Sitara, hahahah how can i man perform YIn Yang..or whatever, its just not possible, we loose our juice too soon,,hahah and ur welcomed in advance, dont have to thank me for giving out the information...

later guys...

This thread is getting awfully funny (pun intended).

Why does sex always have to be ridiculed? Why does it have to be seen as blasphemous? Heck, even the Gods do it! And especially the Gods do it! If humans were made as an image of God, then the fact that humans have sex logically means "so do the Gods!"

Krishna was the divine lover -- yeah, sure we can sugarcoat it and say his love for Radha and the Gopis was a "higher form" of "divine" love. Then we're implying that having sex (or "making love") is a "lower" form of love. Are we doing that? I can anticipate a rebuttal to this effect "Well, it depends on WHO one is having sex (or making love) to" and I can buy that argument because I can see the merit in "differentiation" which is valid. But imposing a hierarchy doesn't sit well with the notion of what love is. And Love, in the end, is just love -- why should there be a hierarchy? Sure, there is a difference in the way love is felt. But must the difference be viewed in a spatial metaphor where one "form" of love is higher or lower? As Gertrude Stein said, "A rose is a rose is a rose is a rose!" And love is as natural and as beautiful as a rose!

In peace.

I don't know about you guys but I don't even know what love is these days. To me it's just a craziness and obsession to one another. Or may be I'm going insane.

Peace Out

I started this thread with simple question, but I don't know from where people brought this Aids, hemophilla, gangbang and what not. Most of the statement I read here is based on illogical fallacy. MM! you are great at putting your words in various way. Somewhere in Sajha I read your sayign about hindu Mythology, was good though, but in this thread you put things otherway around and trying to be hardcore critics. Infact you didn't know you are somehow criticizing your pre-thought.

Simple Gal you are right, there is nothing wrong about sex whether god do it or human. Anyway In different mythological script its been presented as form of art and love. So we should limit our thinking to that extend only. We can come out with any kind of conclusion if we use left instead of right side of our brain. Most of us worship SHIVA LINGA as a part of GOD. That Sclupture not just symbolize LINGA, that linga is inside YONI of Sati as well. So what does that mean? No wonder, some of us will start writing about pre-historic porn action of SHIVA and SHAKTI. Wisely looking at it, it symbolized origin, i.e origin of mankind. And if you unfold the Myth you will see SHIVA and SHAKIT was the origin. It is that simple and its just matter of how we analyse.

Before making fun of Hindu and Hinduism, simple question is how many of us know about GEETA? ya I have heard about it but hvn't got chance to go through it completely. How many of us have even touch VEDAs, atleast I haven't. For your guys information, there are lots of research going on over VEDAs and yes its in Germany, top notch university are doing research over it. We always appreciate westerner theory and hypothesis, but never tried to think those knowlegde and idea are already in VEDAS, PURAN and Bhagwat GEETA, rather we end up makin fun of it. If I ask you guys simple question "WHO BROUGHT AN IDEA OF FLYING MACHINE?", we will say L N DaVinci, thats what we have taught in Mahendra Mala (i dont know the grade). Come on, stress little bit- Rawan had had that before the idea click to LN Davinci. There are lots of things like this from Agniasthra to Brahmasthra which resembles today's WMD and so on, so forth.

I would have little elaborate over R & K unfortunately I didn't. Since I have started this thread I would like to put little light over it. If you guys accept that RAAS LILA is Hardcore sex you should accept the fact Krishna was just about ten years of age at that time, when he did Raas Lila, so was Radha. I believe society then was culturally riched than ours. So if somebody senior would had known Krishna doing sex, Krishna's story would have end right there. So at the age of 10 all his love for Gopis in general and Radha in particular should be seen as divine love between atman and paramatman, without any physical or carnal element. there was spiritual content of love between man and woman.

When krishna flee to MATHURA, he didn't come back Gokul and radha was back there in Gokul. One of Krishna's best friend was MAHAGYANI, his name was UDHAV. They were having debate over MEANS OF ACHIEVING SALVATION. Krishna tried to convince UDHAV that there is no other than love (which is bhakti) to the GOD to achieve SALVATION. Krishna had to send UDHAV to Gokul asking to deliver his message but his intention was to let UDHAV observe extreme love of Radha and Gopis. When he got there he saw extreme devotion and love of GOPIS towards Krishna. It was charismatic. There after UDHAV himself started BHAKTI MARG. And love was still there between Radha and Krishna when they are not physically together.

I am not that hardcore gyani or bhakti, but whatever come to my knowledge I do not think illogically. And I am not sure does everything happened for real or not, but whatever the story and tell was, it was hilarious. The story about A DIVINE LOVE. If you guys think I am frustrated over this thread, yes I am, thats why I am writing this long. By the way, whoever wants to read humor and think nonsense about Hindu Script, religion read DEVASHUR sangram by MODNATH PRASHIT you will love it. There he has define the GOD in his own way.


God bless Nepal.

I started this thread with simple question, but I don't know from where people brought this Aids, hemophilla, gangbang and what not. Most of the statement I read here is based on illogical fallacy. MM! you are great at putting your words in various way. Somewhere in Sajha I read your sayign about hindu Mythology, was good though, but in this thread you put things otherway around and trying to be hardcore critics. Infact you didn't know you are somehow criticizing your pre-thought.

Simple Gal you are right, there is nothing wrong about sex whether god do it or human. Anyway In different mythological script its been presented as form of art and love. So we should limit our thinking to that extend only. We can come out with any kind of conclusion if we use left instead of right side of our brain. Most of us worship SHIVA LINGA as a part of GOD. That Sclupture not just symbolize LINGA, that linga is inside YONI of Sati as well. So what does that mean? No wonder, some of us will start writing about pre-historic porn action of SHIVA and SHAKTI. Wisely looking at it, it symbolized origin, i.e origin of mankind. And if you unfold the Myth you will see SHIVA and SHAKIT was the origin. It is that simple and its just matter of how we analyse.

Before making fun of Hindu and Hinduism, simple question is how many of us know about GEETA? ya I have heard about it but hvn't got chance to go through it completely. How many of us have even touch VEDAs, atleast I haven't. For your guys information, there are lots of research going on over VEDAs and yes its in Germany, top notch university are doing research over it. We always appreciate westerner theory and hypothesis, but never tried to think those knowlegde and idea are already in VEDAS, PURAN and Bhagwat GEETA, rather we end up makin fun of it. If I ask you guys simple question "WHO BROUGHT AN IDEA OF FLYING MACHINE?", we will say L N DaVinci, thats what we have taught in Mahendra Mala (i dont know the grade). Come on, stress little bit- Rawan had had that before the idea click to LN Davinci. There are lots of things like this from Agniasthra to Brahmasthra which resembles today's WMD and so on, so forth.

I would have little elaborate over R & K unfortunately I didn't. Since I have started this thread I would like to put little light over it. If you guys accept that RAAS LILA is Hardcore sex you should accept the fact Krishna was just about ten years of age at that time, when he did Raas Lila, so was Radha. I believe society then was culturally riched than ours. So if somebody senior would had known Krishna doing sex, Krishna's story would have end right there. So at the age of 10 all his love for Gopis in general and Radha in particular should be seen as divine love between atman and paramatman, without any physical or carnal element. there was spiritual content of love between man and woman.

When krishna flee to MATHURA, he didn't come back Gokul and radha was back there in Gokul. One of Krishna's best friend was MAHAGYANI, his name was UDHAV. They were having debate over MEANS OF ACHIEVING SALVATION. Krishna tried to convince UDHAV that there is no other than love (which is bhakti) to the GOD to achieve SALVATION. Krishna had to send UDHAV to Gokul asking to deliver his message but his intention was to let UDHAV observe extreme love of Radha and Gopis. When he got there he saw extreme devotion and love of GOPIS towards Krishna. It was charismatic. There after UDHAV himself started BHAKTI MARG. And love was still there between Radha and Krishna when they are not physically together.

I am not that hardcore gyani or bhakti, but whatever come to my knowledge I do not think illogically. And I am not sure does everything happened for real or not, but whatever the story and tell was, it was hilarious. The story about A DIVINE LOVE. If you guys think I am frustrated over this thread, yes I am, thats why I am writing this long. By the way, whoever wants to read humor and think nonsense about Hindu Script, religion read DEVASHUR sangram by MODNATH PRASHIT you will love it. There he has define the GOD in his own way.


God bless Nepal.