[VIEWED 12435
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
The postings in this thread span 2 pages, go to PAGE 1.
This page is only showing last 20 replies
|
|
p14nd3m1c
Please log in to subscribe to p14nd3m1c's postings.
Posted on 04-06-21 8:33
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
COPY PASTED FROM FACEB00K This article, published by NIHs own journal in 2005, shows that Fauci knew for the last 15 years that chloroquine and its milder version hydroxychloroquine can both treat and prevent the spread of SARS-CoV.
This raises a few important questions:
- Why didn't Fauci, the head of the infectious disease arm of NIH, jump on this early in the pandemic when it would have saved countless lives? Instead he mocked trump for suggesting it. - Did you know that the Lancet, one of the top medical journals, had to retract their 2020 paper that discredited hydroxychloroquine because the data was fake? (They are also being called to retract their fake mask paper.) - Why is this cheap, widely available medication, with a long safety track record, that is over the counter in many countries, being suppressed? Is it because the Emergency Use Authorization for the experimental gene based vaccines would not have been possible if there were an effective medication? - Why are numerous well respected doctors like Dr Peter McCullough and researchers like Dr Tess Lawrie who have solid data showing the effectiveness of cheap, safe treatments being censored?
It appears that suppression of life saving medications is deliberate, and not just due to incompetence. How many lives could have been spared, how much societal disruption and terror could have been prevented, if Fauci/NIAID/NIH did their due diligence and served the American people instead of pharma?
Folks, this is crimes against humanity.
References:
Original chloroquine paper: https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-2-69
Retraction of fake hydroxychloroquine hit piece in the Lancet: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31324-6/fulltext
Dr McCullough senate testimony on 80% efficacy of hydroxychloroquineand ivermectin: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAHi3lX3oGM
Dr Tess Lawrie on how journals will not publish her meta analysis that proves strong efficacy of ivermectin: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQkoL2l3-gg
Calls for retraction of Lancet mask paper: https://metrics.stanford.edu/PNAS%20retraction%20request%20LoE%20061820
Last edited: 06-Apr-21 08:34 AM
|
|
|
The postings in this thread span 2 pages, go to PAGE 1.
This page is only showing last 20 replies
|
|
p14nd3m1c
Please log in to subscribe to p14nd3m1c's postings.
Posted on 04-06-21 2:50
PM [Snapshot: 240]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Silly mangale don't ignore something just because the herd believes it so. Use your brains to ask pertinent questions. Thesedays most people just want to ignore something blindly just because it's not shared by main stream media. Don't let the media think for you. Granted some things are just cuckoo but not everything questioning the MSM is cuckoo. Valid questions. - Why didn't Fauci, the head of the infectious disease arm of NIH, jump on this early in the pandemic when it would have saved countless lives? Instead he mocked trump for suggesting it. - Did you know that the Lancet, one of the top medical journals, had to retract their 2020 paper that discredited hydroxychloroquine because the data was fake? (They are also being called to retract their fake mask paper.) - Why is this cheap, widely available medication, with a long safety track record, that is over the counter in many countries, being suppressed? Is it because the Emergency Use Authorization for the experimental gene based vaccines would not have been possible if there were an effective medication? - Why are numerous well respected doctors like Dr Peter McCullough and researchers like Dr Tess Lawrie who have solid data showing the effectiveness of cheap, safe treatments being censored?
|
|
|
mangale
Please log in to subscribe to mangale's postings.
Posted on 04-06-21 5:11
PM [Snapshot: 288]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
- Why didn't Fauci, the head of the infectious disease arm of NIH, jump on this early in the pandemic when it would have saved countless lives? Instead he mocked trump for suggesting it. Oh now you believe this is PANDEMIC??? Damn!!! Thats a fukcin Breaking News!! Also, Why didn't Trump take Hydrochloroquine? Instead took expensive Remdesevir ? Why he took Fauci or Bill Gates backed vaccines quietly ?
Valid Q&A above. p.s. full credit to tRump for speedy vaccine production.
Last edited: 06-Apr-21 05:12 PM
|
|
|
p14nd3m1c
Please log in to subscribe to p14nd3m1c's postings.
Posted on 04-06-21 6:39
PM [Snapshot: 332]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Oh now you believe this is PANDEMIC??? Damn!!! Thats a fukcin Breaking News!! Like I said, you should stick to immigration speculations. Do you even know what plandemic means? Why you bring Trump into this. Let's leave the mental divide aside and focus on facts.
|
|
|
mangale
Please log in to subscribe to mangale's postings.
Posted on 04-06-21 7:21
PM [Snapshot: 337]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
1
?
Liked by
|
|
Plandemic is when some disgruntled doctors or scientists who can't get to the Fauci position show their opposition though their manipulated or semi-manipulated data to prove the Fauci and others respected scientist wrong. They then find it hard to gain attractions in the real world and hire some digital army in the youtube/reddit/some sajha ;) to promote and express their own personal vendetta against these trusted scientists. Some smart arse folks who think that they think outside the box get into it and think they are smart enough to interpret each data and results to believe that in fact Fauci is deep state or Bill Gates want to depopulate the worlds in order to get to sleep with 14 virgins when he dies in 10-15 years after making 100 trillion dollars out of vaccines rollout. & that was my speculation .... my friend, I rest my case here. Let me get back to my TPS folks.
|
|
|
p14nd3m1c
Please log in to subscribe to p14nd3m1c's postings.
Posted on 04-06-21 7:32
PM [Snapshot: 358]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Sheeps will continue to blindly believe in government officials who support corporation profits. Sheeps will not believe if facts came to bite them in the ass. They need to be told by media because they cannot think for themselves. https://dailycaller.com/2021/04/05/scott-perry-anthony-fauci-niaid-wuhan-funding/ https://www.newsweek.com/dr-fauci-backed-controversial-wuhan-lab-millions-us-dollars-risky-coronavirus-research-1500741 Turns out Fauci really wanted to create this strain of virus because he apparently wanted to created this mutant virus so that he could find a cure for this non existent mutation before it happened. He even sidestepped government channels to get the money over to Wuhan lab. Most likely it was the same virus that escaped out of the lab.
|
|
|
mangale
Please log in to subscribe to mangale's postings.
Posted on 04-06-21 8:50
PM [Snapshot: 396]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Yupp, shit happens. It happened in Hiroshima-Nagasaki, Bhopal, Chernobyl etc. It even happened in my Chem lab too, dropped the beaker and cut in the leg, Sometimes it happens intentionally/unintentionally for good reasons and sometimes bad. You can learn and grow. Pandemic or you call it Plandemic we learn from it so do scientists. Talking about corporation profits, Apple make billions of dollars stealing your identity and putting chip in your pocket. Where's the outcry? Well we choose to let them right? Or we can choose to live in Shivapuri daada as a Baaba. Even Baaba is letting apple steal his fingerprint. These days he unlock his iphone received from his donor with his fingerprint.
|
|
|
p14nd3m1c
Please log in to subscribe to p14nd3m1c's postings.
Posted on 04-07-21 8:47
AM [Snapshot: 554]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Wow this is like a certified sheep response if I have heard any! So don't mind I took a screenshot.
Like a obedient sheep who depends on their masters to tell them what reality is, you believe in your master manipulators the media and their stooges without using any of your own brain cell. You think bhopal, chernobyl, hiroshima, and anything that happens to cause mass incarceration to be fine as long as your media masters tell you it's a done deal. You wait for your media masters to tell you what to be triggered about. I bet if someone says all lives matter you will scream and wince because it's supposed to be black lives matter only. Wait, even asian lives matter now after the attacks on asians.
Your excuse that corporations are supposed to make profit is classic example of ke bujhis mangale afnai dhangale. Of course corporations are supposed to make money but the issue is when government health officials collaborate with corporations to increase their profit at the expense of the public at large then that is a problem and anyone who can think for themselves should start asking questions. But of course being a sheep, you need the media to tell you what to be mad about. They haven't told you to be mad at them and their stooges apparently and they never will so any discussion with you is pointless. So do me a favor and stop responding here, this thread is not for sheeps.
|
|
|
mangale
Please log in to subscribe to mangale's postings.
Posted on 04-07-21 9:50
AM [Snapshot: 579]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
1
?
Liked by
|
|
The real Sheep only share someone else propaganda here and try to present themselves as savior of the world. Copy and paste! That’s all! I am doing service to your propaganda by responding to it! You are welcome!
|
|
|
p14nd3m1c
Please log in to subscribe to p14nd3m1c's postings.
Posted on 04-07-21 10:00
AM [Snapshot: 591]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
1
?
Liked by
|
|
Yup propaganda is like the Nazi propaganda that every sheep bought into before they all got slaughtered. There are people who can sift through the BS and there are people who go with the herd mentality because they are sheeps. Sheeps are only good at getting slaughtered and their dimwit gonna get slaughtered here. Sheeps need not respond. Go watch what Fauci tells you!
|
|
|
p14nd3m1c
Please log in to subscribe to p14nd3m1c's postings.
Posted on 04-07-21 11:06
AM [Snapshot: 638]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Yup it's better to find things that make sense than be sheeps who are fed what to think. Now shoosh. Told ya, this thread is not for sheeps. Stop wasting my time!
|
|
|
p14nd3m1c
Please log in to subscribe to p14nd3m1c's postings.
Posted on 04-07-21 11:39
AM [Snapshot: 669]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Sorry sheeps, I don't want to waste your time on things that are not fed to you by your masters. Shoo off
|
|
|
Sql_server
Please log in to subscribe to Sql_server's postings.
Posted on 04-07-21 3:20
PM [Snapshot: 725]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Hey Plandemic -- Go take the the vaccine..its free dawg...even if you uninsured hahaha. And don't worry about corporate profit..they funding your 401k (if you work in one). 😆
|
|
|
p14nd3m1c
Please log in to subscribe to p14nd3m1c's postings.
Posted on 04-08-21 4:18
AM [Snapshot: 946]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Sheeps cluelessly praising their oppressors on their way to the slaughterhouse. They are beyond restitution. May god have mercy on your brainwashed souls.
I did not post this expecting accolades. Most people follow the news and take what is given to them without asking any questions. If thats what you do then go ahead. But if there are people who ask questions don’t be a moron and tell them to take what is given without asking questions. Not everyone has to live according to your standards.
Last edited: 08-Apr-21 04:25 AM
|
|
|
p14nd3m1c
Please log in to subscribe to p14nd3m1c's postings.
Posted on 04-08-21 9:48
AM [Snapshot: 986]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
You either believe everything they tell you or you question them. How quickly can you forget how they lied about weapons of mass destruction to start a needless war in Iraq, Libya to give untold profit to the corporations. Over a million people dead because of greedy politicians looking after corporation profits and nobody blinks an eye because the media does not protest. It's loud and clear when government officials are not looking out for the common people. Keep on questioning things that do not make sense or be a sheep quietly accepting everything they tell you.
Last edited: 08-Apr-21 09:48 AM
|
|
|
deepocean
Please log in to subscribe to deepocean's postings.
Posted on 04-08-21 3:30
PM [Snapshot: 1045]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
1
?
Liked by
|
|
i want to understand if Hydroxychloroquine works, why? what this medicine has that can treat coronavirus. any scientific valid reason? i prefer besar-aduwa-lasun-kagati-honey umaleko pani than Hydroxychloroquine or any vaccine.
|
|
|
goddamn
Please log in to subscribe to goddamn's postings.
Posted on 04-08-21 4:18
PM [Snapshot: 1053]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
2
?
Liked by
|
|
I want to know that as well. We know lasun aduwa besar etc to increase immune as well but do not know enough to make comment on other stuff. Been watching this thread, want to throw my 2 cents as well. Fauci will benefit from vaccines, if you deny this then you are biased. To be fair, thats his expertise and its natural to have investments on the field which you have detailed knowledge. I do understand it seems like conflict of interest at surface but I think there is enough oversight on his financials that he will not get rich by any wrongdoings. So I personally do not think there is personal finacial motivation for him to make this pandemic worse or he is an evil person. He is just doing his job and is in a tough spot. But.... Fauci is a bureaucrat after all and if you are expecting any efficiency or practical judgement from him then good luck. He is used to too many rules & regulation and will slow any process that he is involved with. It was Trump who overran Fauci and sped up vaccine, opened up businessess, pushed schools to open and tried to make everything back to normal sooner. Looking back Trump was right on almost everything and he was right person at the right time to throw bureaucracy out when necessary. People specially on left right now are making him like a super hero because he recommended against Trump's policies. Michigan governor puts his name in the background pillow and people here follow him blindly. And people on right are angry that he is saying negative stuff about Trump. Its natural and I don't think bad of him but would I prefer him if there is another pandemic or crisis? Hell no. That guy is scared of everythin and is useless without a leader like Trump. I think last week or couple weeks back, he lectured Rand paul that he was still wearing double mask to protect against different variation. But the very next day CDC or some other federal agency said that vaccine is protecting against other variants too. Fauci is doing a lot of things for optics and to save his position not coz they are scientific or practical. He understands that he is mixed in politics now and is playing the game accordingly. He knows that by the time next party he will be retired and has nothing to lose if he sides with dems right now. Infact will benefit by deflecting blane to Trump. So in my opinion, he is book smart, not evil, but very ineefective, sneaky and weak person holding a top government position.
Last edited: 08-Apr-21 04:21 PM
|
|
|
p14nd3m1c
Please log in to subscribe to p14nd3m1c's postings.
Posted on 04-09-21 5:09
AM [Snapshot: 1171]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
![](https://i.imgur.com/OlpTjpg.jpg)
Last edited: 09-Apr-21 05:10 AM
|
|
|
p14nd3m1c
Please log in to subscribe to p14nd3m1c's postings.
Posted on 04-11-21 8:53
AM [Snapshot: 1429]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Bumping this as this is something interesting for a lot of people who are mostly fed disinformation all the time.
|
|
|
p14nd3m1c
Please log in to subscribe to p14nd3m1c's postings.
Posted on 04-11-21 12:28
PM [Snapshot: 1448]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
In an interview on Meet The Press, Dr. Anthony Fauci, who has hyped the Coronavirus vaccine since day one, just admitted the COVID vaccines he hyped as a way to save lives may not actually be safe. In a live interview with Chuck Todd, the New York Post reports that the epidemiologist blatantly stated that the country needed to “make sure” the vaccine truly is safe before we give it to children and maybe pregnant women, whom Fauci said are generally “vulnerable” to vaccines. (Article by John Paluska republished from TheWashingtonGazette.com) The New York Post cites him as saying: The reason is traditionally when you have a situation like a new vaccine, you want to make sure, because children as well as pregnant women, are vulnerable, so, before you put it into the children, you’re going to want to make sure you have a degree of efficacy and safety that is established in an adult population, particularly an adult, normal population. It is for this reason the new vaccine is going to be tested on “hundreds to a couple of thousands” of children, the New York Post reports him saying. So, in short, we don’t know if this vaccine is safe, but we’re going to pump it into children anyways. But what is particularly striking about his statements are when he said we needed to be certain of the vaccine’s safety in a “normal” population. For those of you who are scientifically-minded or work in the field of vaccine testing or statistics, you likely know this means a population that represents the general public. It is worth knowing that no vaccine ever had a “normal” population in any of the tests. Moderna’s own trials tell us this: In the safety analysis of the Phase 3 clinical trial, at the time of vaccination, the mean age of the trial population was 52 years (range 18?95); 22,831 (75.2%) of participants were 18 to 64 years of age and 7,520 (24.8%) of participants were 65 years of age and older. Overall, 52.7% of trial participants were male, and 47.3% were female. Among trial participants in the safety analysis, 20.5% were Hispanic or Latino, 79.2% were White, 10.2% were African American, 4.6% were Asian, 0.8% were American Indian or Alaska Native, 0.2% were Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, 2.1% were Other, and 2.1% were Multiracial. The demographics of the U.S. are ACTUALLY as follows: 50.8% are women, 49.2% are male, 55% are between 18 and 64 years of age, 16.5% are 65 and older, 18.5% are Hispanic or Latino, 76.3% are White, 13.4% are African American, 5.4% are Asian, 1.3% are American Indian or Alaska Native, 2.8% are multiracial. So, old people were drastically over-represented, and African Americans, Asians, and women were underrepresented. Additionally, Hispanics and Latinos were over-represented, while white people were also over-represented. This is hardly a “normal” population. However, we don’t even know the preexisting conditions of the sample group and whether that also followed the “normal” population. Moderna doesn’t tell us any of this. But not even factoring in the health of the participants, just based on this one sample size we can already see, it becomes clear this test group doesn’t align with a “normal” population. According to Dr. Fauci’s recent statements, you only know a vaccine is safe when it hits a “normal” population. So, if we take his statements at face value, there’s no way anyone could have said this vaccine was safe because the trials didn’t consist of a normal population. Further, in Pfizer’s test, they blatantly state it was only performed on “healthy individuals.” We already know from their own study report on page 41 of the PDF that they did not include people with certain STDs. Additionally, they outline the criteria for being barred from the test on page 145 of the report. But, you know, these “healthy people” somehow are representative of the “normal” public and the FDA approved this vaccine for emergency use despite these shortcomings in the trial. So yeah, we knew this vaccine was potentially unsafe, and we know it’s also potentially unsafe for children and maybe even pregnant women, but the government still authorized it on the general public and now they’re trying to authorize it on children. But it doesn’t even end there. . . Dr. Fauci also stated in a White House briefing, according to the New York Post: If you can show that it’s safe and that in fact it induces the kind of response that is reflective of the protection — mainly the correlate of immunity — what you can do is bridge that to the efficacy data that you got from the 30,000[-person] trial with Moderna and the 44,000[-person] trial that we did with Pfizer. “If you can show that it’s safe.” I thought is was safe, Dr. Fauci. I thought the vaccine was safe and effective and that anyone who disagreed was a “conspiracy theorist.” The fact of the matter is, you probably don’t know if it’s safe for children, just like you probably didn’t know if it was safe for adults. That’s likely why the FDA never actually approved the vaccine but only approve its emergency use and why you said we need to test it on a “normal” population to see if it’s safe or not.
|
|
|
p14nd3m1c
Please log in to subscribe to p14nd3m1c's postings.
Posted on 04-12-21 8:45
PM [Snapshot: 1615]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
![](https://i.imgur.com/tSBXLX2.jpg)
Last edited: 12-Apr-21 08:45 PM
|
|
|